Zhu Yuyang, Yang Yi, Zhang Qinyu, Li Xuan, Xue Wenqiang, Liu Yuan, Zhao Yufei, Xu Wenxia, Yan Peng, Li Shuang, Fang Yu, Huang Jie
Department of Anesthesiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, Yunnan, China.
Clin J Pain. 2025 Jan 1;41(1):e1259. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001259.
Effective postoperative analgesia is critical for thoracic surgery. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB), retrolaminar block (RLB), and paravertebral block (TPVB) in single-incision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SITS).
Seventy-six patients underwent general anesthesia followed by ultrasound-guided nerve blocks with 20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Primary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) of numeric rating scale (NRS) scores during rest and coughing over 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included perioperative opioid use, plasma biomarkers, and postoperative recovery measures.
The AUC for NRS was 107.8±10.53 in the ESPB group, 104.8±8.05 in the RLB group, and 103.6±10.42 in the TPVB group, demonstrating noninferiority for ESPB (difference: 4.2±3.0, 95% CI: -1.82 to 10.22) and RLB (difference: 1.2±2.6, 95% CI: -3.97 to 6.37) compared with TPVB. No statistically significant differences were observed in opioid use, plasma biomarkers, QoR-15 scores, or adverse events.
ESPB and RLB provide noninferior analgesia compared with TPVB in SITS patients and are effective alternatives that enhance safety.
有效的术后镇痛对胸外科手术至关重要。本研究比较竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)、椎板后阻滞(RLB)和胸椎旁阻滞(TPVB)在单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(SITS)中的镇痛效果。
76例患者接受全身麻醉,然后在超声引导下用20ml 0.5%罗哌卡因进行神经阻滞。主要结局包括24小时静息和咳嗽期间数字评分量表(NRS)评分的曲线下面积(AUC)。次要结局包括围手术期阿片类药物使用、血浆生物标志物和术后恢复指标。
ESPB组NRS的AUC为107.8±10.53,RLB组为104.8±8.05,TPVB组为103.6±10.42,表明ESPB(差异:4.2±3.0,95%CI:-1.82至10.22)和RLB(差异:1.2±2.6,95%CI:-3.97至6.37)与TPVB相比具有非劣效性。在阿片类药物使用、血浆生物标志物、QoR-15评分或不良事件方面未观察到统计学显著差异。
在SITS患者中,ESPB和RLB与TPVB相比提供非劣效性镇痛,是增强安全性的有效替代方法。