Department of Anesthesiology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Huzhou Central Hospital, Huzhou, China.
J Perianesth Nurs. 2024 Oct;39(5):887-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.01.001. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block to continuous thoracic paravertebral block on postoperative analgesia in elderly patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy.
Randomized controlled trial.
Elderly patients (N = 50) who underwent nonemergent thoracoscopic lobectomy in the thoracic surgery department of our hospital from January 2019 to December 2020 were selected and randomly divided into continuous erector spinae block (ESPB; n = 25) group and continuous thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB; n = 25) group. The patients in the two groups were guided by ultrasound with ESPB or TPVB before anesthesia induction. The visual analog scale at rest and cough in 2 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours after surgery, the supplementary analgesic dosage of tramadol, time of tube placement, the stay time in postanesthesia care unit (PACU), the first ambulation time after surgery, the length of postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complications were recorded.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in visual analog scale score at rest and cough at each time point and supplementary analgesic dosage of tramadol within 48 hours after surgery (P > .05). The time of tube placement and the postoperative hospital stay in ESPB group was significantly shorter than that in TPVB group (P < .05). There were no differences in PACU residence time and first ambulation time between the two groups (P > .05). There were 4 patients in TPVB group and 2 patients in ESPB group who had nausea and vomiting (P > .05), 1 case of pneumothorax and 1 case of fever in the TPVB group. There were no incision infections or respiratory depression requiring clinical intervention in either group.
Both ESPB and TPVB alleviated the patients postoperative pain effectively for elderly patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. Compared with TPVB, patients with ESPB have a shorter tube placement time, fewer complications and faster postoperative recovery.
本研究旨在比较超声引导下连续竖脊肌平面阻滞与连续胸椎旁神经阻滞对行胸腔镜肺叶切除术老年患者术后镇痛的影响。
随机对照试验。
选择 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在我院胸外科行非急诊胸腔镜肺叶切除术的老年患者(N=50),随机分为连续竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB;n=25)组和连续胸椎旁神经阻滞(TPVB;n=25)组。两组患者在麻醉诱导前均在超声引导下进行 ESPB 或 TPVB。记录术后 2 小时、6 小时、8 小时、12 小时、24 小时、48 小时静息和咳嗽时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)、曲马多的辅助镇痛剂量、置管时间、麻醉后监护室(PACU)停留时间、术后首次下床时间、术后住院时间和术后并发症。
两组患者在术后 48 小时内各时间点静息和咳嗽时的 VAS 评分和曲马多的辅助镇痛剂量均无统计学差异(P>.05)。ESPB 组置管时间和术后住院时间明显短于 TPVB 组(P<.05)。两组 PACU 停留时间和首次下床时间无差异(P>.05)。TPVB 组 4 例、ESPB 组 2 例患者出现恶心呕吐(P>.05),TPVB 组 1 例气胸、1 例发热。两组均无切口感染或需要临床干预的呼吸抑制。
对于行胸腔镜肺叶切除术的老年患者,ESPB 和 TPVB 均可有效缓解患者术后疼痛。与 TPVB 相比,ESPB 患者置管时间更短,并发症更少,术后恢复更快。