Suppr超能文献

贝伐单抗联合抗PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂与肝动脉灌注化疗治疗初治不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性

The Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab Plus Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination with Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

作者信息

Tang Xiang, Chen Jinbin, Peng Wei, Yang Zhoutian, Hu Li, Ye Zhiwei, Fu Yizhen, Hu Dandan, Zhou Zhongguo, Chen Minshan, Zhang Yaojun, Wang Jun-Cheng

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.

Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Immunotargets Ther. 2024 Oct 26;13:559-569. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S478685. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

OBJECTION

To report the efficacy and safety of triple combination therapy with bevacizumab plus anti-PD-1 (BP1) or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors (BPL) combined with hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a first-line treatment for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients with initially uHCC received either BP1-HAIC or BPL-HAIC as first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

Between January 2020 and December 2022, a total of 136 patients with initially uHCC received triple combination therapy, with 76 in the BP1-HAIC group and 60 in the BPL-HAIC group. The median PFS for the entire cohort was 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-13.7 months), and the median OS was 22.4 months (95% CI, 21.3- not reached). Comparative analysis revealed no significant differences in PFS (HR, 0.91, = 0.69) or OS (HR, 0.71, = 0.31) between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. The ORR was 46.3% per RECIST v1.1 and 66.9% per mRECIST, with a DCR of 83.1% under both criteria. Common adverse events (AEs) included hypoalbuminemia and elevated aspartate/alanine aminotransferase, with 5.1% (7/136) experienced upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Multivariate Cox analysis identified tumor number and BCLC stage as independent prognostic factors for OS, and tumor number for PFS.

CONCLUSION

Triple combination therapy demonstrated significant therapeutic efficacy and tumor response in initially uHCC. No notable differences in outcomes were observed between the BP1-HAIC and BPL-HAIC groups. AEs were manageable in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

报告贝伐单抗联合抗程序性死亡蛋白1(BP1)或抗程序性死亡配体1抑制剂(BPL)与肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)三联疗法作为初治不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)一线治疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,初治uHCC患者接受BP1-HAIC或BPL-HAIC作为一线治疗。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS);次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。

结果

2020年1月至2022年12月期间,共有136例初治uHCC患者接受三联疗法,其中BP1-HAIC组76例,BPL-HAIC组60例。整个队列的中位PFS为11.1个月(95%CI,8.0-13.7个月),中位OS为22.4个月(95%CI,21.3-未达到)。比较分析显示,BP1-HAIC组和BPL-HAIC组之间在PFS(HR,0.91,P = 0.69)或OS(HR,0.71,P = 0.31)方面无显著差异。根据RECIST v1.1标准,ORR为46.3%,根据mRECIST标准为66.9%,两种标准下的DCR均为83.1%。常见不良事件(AE)包括低白蛋白血症和天冬氨酸/丙氨酸转氨酶升高,5.1%(7/136)的患者发生上消化道出血。多因素Cox分析确定肿瘤数量和BCLC分期为OS的独立预后因素,肿瘤数量为PFS的独立预后因素。

结论

三联疗法在初治uHCC中显示出显著的治疗效果和肿瘤反应。BP1-HAIC组和BPL-HAIC组之间在疗效上未观察到显著差异。不良事件在临床实践中是可控的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c134/11524013/3be4b32693a3/ITT-13-559-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验