Burstein Or, Aryeh Tamara, Geva Ronny
Department of Psychology, Bar-Ilan University.
Dev Psychol. 2024 Oct 31. doi: 10.1037/dev0001844.
Major amendments in neonatal care have been introduced in recent decades. It is important to understand whether these amendments improved the cognitive sequelae of preterm children. Through a large-scale meta-analysis, we explored the association between prematurity-related complications, neonatal care quality, and cognitive development from birth until 7 years. MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, and EBSCO were searched. Peer-reviewed studies published between 1970 and 2022 using standardized tests were included. We evaluated differences between preterm and full-term children in focal developmental domains using random-effects meta-analyses. We analyzed data from 161 studies involving 39,799 children. Preterm birth was associated with inferior outcomes in global cognitive development (standardized mean difference = -0.57, 95% CI [-0.63, -0.52]), as well as in language/communication, visuospatial, and motor performance, reflecting mean decreases of approximately 7.3 to 9.3 developmental/intelligence quotients. Extreme prematurity, neonatal pulmonary morbidities, and older assessment age in very-to-extreme preterm cohorts were associated with worse outcomes. Contemporary neonatal medical and developmental care were associated with transient improvements in global cognitive development, evident until 2 to 3 years of age but not after. Blinding of examiners to participants' gestational background was associated with poorer outcomes in preterm cohorts, suggesting the possibility of a "compassion bias." The results suggest that preterm birth remains associated with poorer cognitive development in early childhood, especially following pulmonary diseases and very-to-extreme preterm delivery. Importantly, deficits become more pervasive with age, but only after births before 32 gestational weeks and not in moderate-to-late preterm cohorts. Care advancements show promising signs of promoting resiliency in the early years but need further refinements throughout childhood. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
近几十年来,新生儿护理领域引入了重大变革。了解这些变革是否改善了早产儿的认知后遗症非常重要。通过大规模的荟萃分析,我们探讨了早产相关并发症、新生儿护理质量与出生至7岁儿童认知发展之间的关联。我们检索了MEDLINE、APA PsycInfo和EBSCO数据库。纳入了1970年至2022年间发表的使用标准化测试的同行评审研究。我们使用随机效应荟萃分析评估了早产儿和足月儿在重点发育领域的差异。我们分析了来自161项研究、涉及39799名儿童的数据。早产与整体认知发展较差的结果相关(标准化平均差=-0.57,95%置信区间[-0.63,-0.52]),在语言/沟通、视觉空间和运动表现方面也是如此,这反映出平均发育/智商下降约7.3至9.3。极早产、新生儿肺部疾病以及极早早产队列中较大的评估年龄与更差的结果相关。当代新生儿医疗和发育护理与整体认知发展的短暂改善相关,这种改善在2至3岁之前明显,但之后则不然。检查者对参与者的孕周背景不知情与早产队列中较差的结果相关,这表明可能存在“同情偏见”。结果表明,早产仍然与幼儿期较差的认知发展相关,尤其是在患有肺部疾病和极早早产之后。重要的是,缺陷随着年龄增长变得更加普遍,但仅在妊娠32周前出生的情况下如此,中度至晚期早产队列中则不然。护理方面的进步显示出在早年促进恢复力的良好迹象,但在整个儿童期还需要进一步完善。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2024美国心理学会,保留所有权利)