Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci. 2024 Nov;133(8):678-689. doi: 10.1037/abn0000943.
Within-disorder heterogeneity complicates mapping the neurobiological features of psychopathology to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders conceptualizations. The present study explored the patterns of diagnostic classification errors among disorders with commonly co-occurring features to examine this heterogeneity. Classification analyses were conducted with the University of California, Los Angeles Phenomics Study database using a support-vector classifier to differentiate disorders via whole brain task-based functional connectivity, predicting that model misclassifications would provide insight about brain connectivity characteristics shared across disorders. Whether symptoms and specific brain networks could account for misclassification rates was also explored. The classification model performed better than chance (44% accuracy, p = .01) and revealed that misclassification of schizophrenia (SCZ) as bipolar disorder (BD; 38%) and BD as SCZ (36%) was symmetrical. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was misclassified as BD at the highest rate (46%) and higher than the converse (17%). SCZ and ADHD were misclassified least (15% SCZ as ADHD and 22% ADHD as SCZ). Considerable variance in misclassification of SCZ as BD (R2 = .83) and BD as SCZ (R2 = .71) could be accounted for by symptoms of both SCZ and BD. Permutation testing revealed disorder- and network-specific effects, with certain networks improving classification accuracy and others hindering it for specific disorders. An approach focused on classification errors replicated known disorder overlap, producing errors in the expected configuration. Further, it identified clinical and neural features within and across diagnostic categories that contribute to disorder misclassification and within-disorder heterogeneity. This approach may facilitate neurobiologically informed phenotypic differentiation within diagnostic groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
在精神障碍中,同症异质性使得将神经生物学特征映射到《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(DSM)概念化变得复杂。本研究通过探索具有共同特征的障碍之间的诊断分类错误模式来研究这种异质性。使用支持向量分类器对加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校表型研究数据库进行分类分析,通过全脑任务功能连接来区分障碍,预测模型错误分类将提供有关跨障碍共享的大脑连接特征的见解。还探讨了症状和特定大脑网络是否可以解释分类错误率。分类模型的表现优于随机(准确率为 44%,p=0.01),并表明精神分裂症(SCZ)误诊为双相障碍(BD;38%)和 BD 误诊为 SCZ(36%)是对称的。注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)误诊为 BD 的比例最高(46%),高于相反情况(17%)。SCZ 和 ADHD 误诊最少(15%的 SCZ 误诊为 ADHD,22%的 ADHD 误诊为 SCZ)。SCZ 误诊为 BD(R2=0.83)和 BD 误诊为 SCZ(R2=0.71)的分类错误中,SCZ 和 BD 的症状可以解释相当大的差异。置换检验显示出障碍和网络的特异性影响,某些网络提高了分类准确性,而其他网络则阻碍了特定障碍的分类准确性。一种专注于分类错误的方法复制了已知的障碍重叠,产生了预期的配置错误。此外,它还确定了有助于障碍分类错误和同症异质性的诊断类别内和跨诊断类别的临床和神经特征。这种方法可能有助于在诊断组内进行基于神经生物学的表型分化。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2024 APA,保留所有权利)。