A 3-arm randomized control trial to compare the efficacy of re-circulant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy versus conventional intravesical mitomycin C and BCG therapy for intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the efficacy and side effects of re-circulant hyperthermic intravesical chemotherapy versus conventional treatments for intermediate risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

METHODS

A randomized 3-arm, parallel group trial was conducted at a single tertiary care centre. 135 patients with low-grade intermediate-risk cancer, having undergone complete resection of bladder tumor were included. Patients were assigned 1:1:1, to receive intra-vesical chemo-hyperthermia (C-HT), mitomycin-C (MMC) or BCG therapy. There was no treatment crossover. Patients were followed up with check cystoscopy every 3 months for histopathological recurrence.

RESULTS

The three arms were comparable in terms of age, gender, tumor size, number of tumors and clinical stage or grade of tumors. Mean tumor size was 2.58 (± 0.88) cm and the mean number of tumors resected was 2.04 (± 1.02) (Range 1-5). There was no significant difference between the various groups for tumor recurrence (χ2 = 1.96, p = 0.375) or time to recurrence (13.6 vs. 10.8 vs. 9.8 months, p = 0.844) though incidence of non-healing necrotic area was higher with C-HT (22.2% vs. 11.1% and 4.8%, χ2 = 6.093, p = 0.048). Median (IQR) follow up period was 26 (12-52) months. Treatment discontinuation or drug intolerance was significantly higher in BCG arm (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravesical C-HT with MMC, conventional MMC and BCG are equally effective and comparable alternatives for intravesical therapy in low-grade intermediate-risk NMIBC. Higher incidence of non-healing resection site with C-HT and higher local symptoms with BCG are a concern.