Suppr超能文献

物流配送中心的绩效模型:基于最佳最差法的质量功能配置

The performance model of logistic distribution centers: Quality function deployment based on the Best-Worst Method.

机构信息

Institute of Postgraduate Studies, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Faculty of Management, Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0305202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305202. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the performance of logistic distribution centers (LDCs) by Quality Function Deployment (QFD) based on the Best-Worst Method (BWM). The originalities of this paper include: (1) exploring five constructs with 20 customer requirement attributes (CRAs) for LDCs' operations based on the SERQUAL model, (2) using the QFD model to identify five primary divisions and 18 corresponding service technical requirements (STRs) for LDCs' operations, (3) recognizing the top five STRs should be prioritized for the allocation of limited resources from House of Quality (HoQ), including cargo order (7.15%), value-added activities (6.68%), document preparation (6.31%), consolidating and assembling (6.10%), and document management (6.00%), (4) applying the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to estimate CRAs' relative weight. The proposed research model can provide a methodological reference to the relevant literature in association with logistics operations and multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA).

摘要

本文旨在通过基于最佳-最差方法(Best-Worst Method,BWM)的质量功能配置(Quality Function Deployment,QFD)来评估物流配送中心(Logistic Distribution Centers,LDC)的绩效。本文的创新点包括:(1)基于 SERQUAL 模型,探索了五个具有 20 个客户需求属性(Customer Requirement Attributes,CRAs)的 LDC 运营构建;(2)使用 QFD 模型确定了五个主要的分部和 18 个相应的服务技术要求(Service Technical Requirements,STRs);(3)从质量屋(House of Quality,HoQ)中识别出应优先考虑的五个 STRs,以分配有限的资源,包括货物订单(7.15%)、增值活动(6.68%)、文件准备(6.31%)、整合和组装(6.10%)以及文件管理(6.00%);(4)应用最佳-最差方法(Best-Worst Method,BWM)来估计 CRAs 的相对权重。所提出的研究模型可以为物流运营和多准则决策分析(Multiple-Criteria Decision Analysis,MCDA)相关文献提供方法学参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9b2/11527329/163ed7b03253/pone.0305202.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The performance model of logistic distribution centers: Quality function deployment based on the Best-Worst Method.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 31;19(10):e0305202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305202. eCollection 2024.
2
A navigational risk evaluation of ferry transport: Continuous risk management matrix based on fuzzy Best-Worst Method.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0309667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309667. eCollection 2024.
3
Hypergraph and network flow-based quality function deployment.
Heliyon. 2022 Dec 9;8(12):e12263. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12263. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Quality function deployment modified for the food industry: An example of a granola bar.
Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Apr 3;7(5):1746-1753. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1014. eCollection 2019 May.
5
Developing new services using fuzzy QFD: a LIFENET case study.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2008;21(7):638-58. doi: 10.1108/09526860810910122.
6
Quality function deployment in healthcare: a literature review and case study.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(2):135-46. doi: 10.1108/09526861311297343.
8
Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Dec 12;15(12):2834. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122834.
9
Enhancing cassava grater design: A customer-driven approach using AHP, QFD, and TRIZ integration.
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 13;10(16):e36167. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36167. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
10
mHealth apps design using quality function deployment.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 May 13;32(4):698-708. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-08-2018-0195.

引用本文的文献

1
An assessment model of bio-efficiency for container terminals in the presence of air emissions.
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 19;20(3):e0319423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319423. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritization of land consolidation projects using the multi-criteria Best-Worst Method: a case study from Poland.
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Aug 17;195(9):1045. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11712-w.
2
Container terminals' efficiency with the unexpected output: a revised SBM approach.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37845-37858. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24890-w. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
4
Assessing port service quality: An application of the extension fuzzy AHP and importance-performance analysis.
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264590. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264590. eCollection 2022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验