• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测烧伤概率:降维策略可实现精确且计算高效的代理模型。

Predicting burn probability: Dimensionality reduction strategies enable accurate and computationally efficient metamodeling.

机构信息

The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:123086. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123086. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123086
PMID:39481159
Abstract

Predicting the probability that a given location will be burnt by a wildfire is an important part of understanding the risk that wildfires pose and how our management actions (e.g., prescribed burning) can reduce this risk. Existing methods to quantify this burn probability involve simulating the spread of many thousands of individual wildfires, making them highly computationally expensive. To reduce this expense, we propose strategies that enable the development of computationally efficient machine learning assisted metamodels for estimating burn probability, which are demonstrated for a case study in South Australia. Artificial neural networks are used as the metamodel to emulate the outputs of a landscape fire simulation model. Development of the metamodel is facilitated by reducing the input and output dimensionality of the simulation model by a factor of 10,000-1,000,000, while still being able to predict burn probabilities with high accuracy (approximately ± 7.4% error, on average) and only requiring 0.6% of the computational time compared with an approach using landscape fire simulation models. This opens the door to obtaining many thousands of spatially distributed estimates of burn probability, as is required when optimising fuel treatment strategies.

摘要

预测给定地点发生野火燃烧的概率是了解野火风险以及我们的管理措施(例如,有计划的燃烧)如何降低这种风险的重要部分。现有的量化这种燃烧概率的方法涉及模拟数千个单独野火的蔓延,这使得它们的计算成本非常高。为了降低这种成本,我们提出了一些策略,使开发计算效率高的机器学习辅助的燃烧概率估算元模型成为可能,并在南澳大利亚的一个案例研究中进行了演示。人工神经网络被用作元模型来模拟景观火灾模拟模型的输出。通过将模拟模型的输入和输出维度降低 10000-1000000 倍,同时仍然能够以高精度(平均约±7.4%的误差)预测燃烧概率,并与使用景观火灾模拟模型的方法相比仅需要 0.6%的计算时间,从而促进了元模型的开发。这为优化燃料处理策略时所需的数千个空间分布的燃烧概率估计开辟了道路。

相似文献

1
Predicting burn probability: Dimensionality reduction strategies enable accurate and computationally efficient metamodeling.预测烧伤概率:降维策略可实现精确且计算高效的代理模型。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Dec;371:123086. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123086. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
2
Fuel reduction burning reduces wildfire severity during extreme fire events in south-eastern Australia.林火燃烧减少措施降低了澳大利亚东南部极端火灾事件中的野火严重程度。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 1;343:118171. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118171. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Studying the effects of fuel treatment based on burn probability on a boreal forest landscape.研究基于燃烧概率的燃料处理对北方森林景观的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 30;115:42-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.004. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
4
Burn me twice, shame on who? Interactions between successive forest fires across a temperate mountain region.两度被烧伤,羞煞谁?温带山区连续森林火灾间的相互作用。
Ecology. 2016 Sep;97(9):2272-2282. doi: 10.1002/ecy.1439.
5
Fuel treatment effectiveness in the context of landform, vegetation, and large, wind-driven wildfires.在地形、植被和大型、风力驱动的野火背景下的燃料处理效果。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jul;30(5):e02104. doi: 10.1002/eap.2104. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Detecting critical nodes in forest landscape networks to reduce wildfire spread.检测森林景观网络中的关键节点,以减少野火蔓延。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 7;16(10):e0258060. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258060. eCollection 2021.
7
The Trade-offs between Wildfires and Prescribed Fires: A Case Study for 2016 Gatlinburg Wildfires.野火与计划性火烧之间的权衡:以2016年加特林堡野火为例
ACS EST Air. 2025 Jan 9;2(2):236-248. doi: 10.1021/acsestair.4c00233. eCollection 2025 Feb 14.
8
Improved accuracy of wildfire simulations using fuel hazard estimates based on environmental data.利用基于环境数据的燃料危险评估来提高野火模拟的准确性。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Jan 1;301:113789. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113789. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
9
Evaluating priority locations and potential benefits for building a nation-wide fuel break network in Portugal.评估在葡萄牙全国范围内建立燃料阻隔带网络的优先地点和潜在效益。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115920. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115920. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Transferable and data efficient metamodeling of storm water system nodal depths using auto-regressive graph neural networks.基于自回归图神经网络的雨污水系统节点深度可迁移和数据高效元模型化。
Water Res. 2024 Nov 15;266:122396. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.122396. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Burns: Multi-Center Assessment Comparing AI Models and Experienced Plastic Surgeons.烧伤管理:比较人工智能模型与经验丰富的整形外科医生的多中心评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 29;14(9):3078. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093078.