The effect of intra-aortic balloon pump on survival and neurological outcome in patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

INTRODUCTION

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is increasingly used to treat refractory cardiac arrest, although with variable results in survival and neurological outcomes. The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) showed mixed effects on survival in veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Furthermore, the impact of IABP on survival and neurological outcomes in ECPR recipients has yet to be fully investigated.

METHODS

We searched relevant databases for studies concerning ECPR recipients and intra-aortic balloon pump with information on survival and neurological outcomes. The inverse variance method (95 % confidence intervals) was used to determine the odds ratios of outcomes. We decided on a priori use of the random-effects model with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment.

RESULTS

We included in our analysis nine cohort studies dealing with a total of 4994 patients. The association of IABP with ECPR was associated with a survival benefit compared to ECPR alone: 1029/3124 (32.9 %) patients survived in the ECPR+IABP group versus 379/1870 (20.2 %) in the ECPR group, OR 1.94, 95 % CI [1.36 to 2.77]. Survival with good neurological outcome was analyzed in 4 studies for 4018 patients. The association of ECPR and IABP was associated with a not significant advantage in survival with favorable neurological outcome compared with ECPR alone: 555/2687 (20.7 %) patients with good neurological outcome in the group of ECPR+IABP versus 149/1331 (11.2 %) patients in the group of ECPR, OR 1.33, 95 % CI [0.61 to 2.92].

CONCLUSIONS

The association of IABP and ECPR significantly increases survival rates compared to ECPR alone. Nevertheless, the impact on favorable neurological outcomes remains uncertain.