Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain; Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Centre for Ecological Research and Forestry Applications (CREAF), 08193, Bellaterra, Spain; Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Environ Pollut. 2024 Dec 15;363(Pt 2):125223. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.125223. Epub 2024 Oct 30.
Fungicides may interact synergistically with insecticides. However, our understanding of the impacts of sublethal insecticide-fungicide combinations on solitary bees is mostly restricted to laboratory studies, providing no information about potential consequences on behavior and reproductive success. We analyzed the effects of a fungicide application, alone and in combination with sublethal levels of an insecticide, on the nesting behavior and reproductive output of the solitary bee Osmia cornuta. We released individually-marked females into oilseed rape field cages, and subsequently sprayed the plants with four treatments: control (water), fungicide (tebuconazole), insecticide (acetamiprid at a sublethal concentration), and mixture (fungicide + insecticide). We recorded nesting activity before and after the sprays and assessed post-spray individual reproductive success. Bees of the single pesticide treatments were unaffected by the sprays and did not differ from control bees in any of the parameters measured. The longevity of bees of the mixture treatment was unaffected. However, these bees showed reduced foraging activity, shorter in-nest pollen-nectar deposition times, and increased difficulty recognizing their nesting cavity, leading to a decrease in provisioning rate, parental investment, and offspring production. Our study demonstrates that co-exposure to a fungicide with otherwise harmless levels of an insecticide caused behavioral effects with consequences on reproductive success. Because longevity was unaffected, these effects would not have been easily detected in a chronic laboratory test. Our results have important implications for bee risk assessment, which should account for exposure to multiple compounds and address behavioral effects and reproductive output under semi-field and/or field conditions.
杀菌剂可能与杀虫剂协同作用。然而,我们对亚致死水平的杀虫剂-杀菌剂组合对独居蜂的影响的理解主要局限于实验室研究,无法提供关于对行为和繁殖成功的潜在后果的信息。我们分析了杀菌剂单独使用以及与亚致死浓度的杀虫剂组合使用对独居蜜蜂 Osmia cornuta 的筑巢行为和繁殖结果的影响。我们将单独标记的雌性释放到油菜田笼中,然后用四种处理方法喷洒植物:对照(水)、杀菌剂(戊唑醇)、杀虫剂(噻虫胺亚致死浓度)和混合物(杀菌剂+杀虫剂)。我们在喷洒前后记录筑巢活动,并评估喷洒后的个体繁殖成功率。单一农药处理的蜜蜂不受喷洒影响,在测量的任何参数上都与对照蜜蜂没有区别。混合物处理的蜜蜂的寿命不受影响。然而,这些蜜蜂的觅食活动减少,在巢内花粉-花蜜沉积的时间缩短,并且识别其巢穴的难度增加,导致供应率、亲代投资和后代产量下降。我们的研究表明,同时接触杀菌剂和其他无害水平的杀虫剂会导致行为效应,从而对繁殖成功产生影响。由于寿命不受影响,这些影响在慢性实验室测试中不容易被发现。我们的结果对蜜蜂风险评估具有重要意义,风险评估应考虑到暴露于多种化合物,并在半田间和/或田间条件下解决行为效应和繁殖结果。