Suppr超能文献

为什么生态学家难以从功能性状预测共存情况。

Why ecologists struggle to predict coexistence from functional traits.

作者信息

Levine Jacob I, An Ruby, Kraft Nathan J B, Pacala Stephen W, Levine Jonathan M

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 2025 Feb;40(2):147-158. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

Abstract

The rationale behind trait-based ecology is that shifting focus from species' taxonomic names to their measurable characteristics ('functional traits') leads to greater generality and predictive power. This idea has been applied to one of ecology's most intractable problems: the coexistence of competing species. But after 20 years, we lack clear evidence that functional traits effectively predict coexistence. Here, we present a theory-based argument for why this might be the case. Specifically, we argue that coexistence often depends on special quantities called 'process-informed metrics' (PIMs), which combine multiple traits and demographic characteristics in non-intuitive ways, obscuring any direct ties between individual traits and coexistence. We then lay a path forward for trait-based coexistence research that builds on mechanistic models of competition.

摘要

基于性状的生态学背后的基本原理是,将关注点从物种的分类名称转移到其可测量的特征(“功能性状”)上会带来更高的普遍性和预测能力。这一理念已被应用于生态学中最棘手的问题之一:竞争物种的共存。但20年过去了,我们仍缺乏明确的证据表明功能性状能有效预测共存情况。在此,我们提出一个基于理论的观点来解释为何会出现这种情况。具体而言,我们认为共存通常取决于一类特殊的量,即“过程导向指标”(PIMs),这些指标以非直观的方式结合了多个性状和种群统计学特征,从而模糊了个体性状与共存之间的任何直接联系。然后,我们为基于性状的共存研究指明了一条前进的道路,该研究建立在竞争的机理模型之上。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验