Kamil Wisam, Kruger Estie, Jean Gillian, Tennant Marc
Department of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, School of Human Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
International Research Collaborative - Oral Health and Equity, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Gerodontology. 2025 Jun;42(2):277-282. doi: 10.1111/ger.12792. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
Limited access to oral health services contributes to poor oral health in institutionalised older adults. The objective of this study was to map and analyse the distribution of residential age-care facilities (RACFs) in relation to dental practices across Australia.
Age-care data were sourced from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The data were categorised according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics remoteness index in each state and territory, defined by a geographic coordinate system. The structure of remoteness area data was integrated into RACF data using a geographic information system. Buffer analysis in QGIS was employed to calculate the buffer distance surrounding RACFs by identifying dental practices relative to a measuring distance.
In total, Australia had 2718 RACFs and 7379 dental practices (both private 95.5% and public 4.5%). In all States, more than a third of metropolitan RACFs were within accessible reach of a private practice (ranging from 37% of RACFs in NSW to 55% in WA). However, proximity to public clinics was low, ranging from only 4% (WA) to 9% (QLD). More than one-fifth of metropolitan RACFs in NSW, QLD, WA and ACT (ranging from 20% to 24%) were not within accessible proximity of either a public or private dental clinic/practice. While more than 70% of RACFs in regional and remote Australia are reasonably close to dental practices, areas with inadequate access exist, with the highest percentage recorded in WA (6%).
Ensuring an equitable distribution of dental practices relative to RACFs is crucial in bridging the service access gap in underserved areas.
获得口腔健康服务的机会有限,导致机构养老的老年人口腔健康状况不佳。本研究的目的是绘制并分析澳大利亚各地与牙科诊所相关的老年护理机构(RACF)的分布情况。
老年护理数据来自澳大利亚卫生与福利研究所。这些数据根据每个州和领地的澳大利亚统计局偏远指数进行分类,该指数由地理坐标系统定义。利用地理信息系统将偏远地区数据的结构整合到RACF数据中。在QGIS中进行缓冲区分析,通过确定相对于测量距离的牙科诊所来计算RACF周围的缓冲区距离。
澳大利亚共有2718家RACF和7379家牙科诊所(私立诊所占95.5%,公立诊所占4.5%)。在所有州,超过三分之一的大都市RACF在私立诊所的可达范围内(从新南威尔士州的37%到西澳大利亚州的55%)。然而,靠近公共诊所的比例较低,从仅4%(西澳大利亚州)到9%(昆士兰州)不等。新南威尔士州、昆士兰州、西澳大利亚州和澳大利亚首都直辖区超过五分之一的大都市RACF(从20%到24%)不在公共或私立牙科诊所/机构的可达范围内。虽然澳大利亚地区和偏远地区超过70%的RACF距离牙科诊所相当近,但仍存在服务不足的地区,其中西澳大利亚州的比例最高(6%)。
确保牙科诊所相对于RACF的公平分布对于弥合服务不足地区的服务获取差距至关重要。