Halperin H R, Tsitlik J E, Guerci A D, Mellits E D, Levin H R, Shi A Y, Chandra N, Weisfeldt M L
Circulation. 1986 Mar;73(3):539-50. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.73.3.539.
Whether blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) results from intrathoracic pressure fluctuations or direct cardiac compression remains controversial. From modeling considerations, blood flow due to intrathoracic pressure fluctuations should be insensitive to compression rate over a wide range, but dependent on the applied force and compression duration. If direct compression of the heart plays a major role, however, flow should be dependent on compression rate and force, but above a threshold, insensitive to compression duration. These differences in hemodynamics produced by changes in rate and duration form a basis for determining whether blood flow during CPR results from intrathoracic pressure fluctuations or from direct cardiac compression. Manual CPR was studied in eight anesthetized, 21 to 32 kg dogs after induction of ventricular fibrillation. There was no surgical manipulation of the chest. Myocardial and cerebral blood flows were determined with radioactive microspheres. At nearly constant peak sternal force (378 to 426 newtons), flow was significantly increased when the duration of compression was increased from 14 +/- 1% to 46 +/- 3% of the cycle at a rate of 60/min. Flow was unchanged, however, after an increase in rate from 60 to 150/min at constant compression duration. The hemodynamics of manual CPR were next compared with those produced by vest inflation with simultaneous ventilation (vest CPR) in eight other dogs. Vest CPR changed intrathoracic pressure without direct cardiac compression, since sternal displacement was less than 0.8 cm. At a rate of 150/min, with similar duration and right atrial peak pressure, manual and vest CPR produced similar flow and perfusion pressures. Finally, the hemodynamics of manual CPR were compared with the hemodynamics of direct cardiac compression after thoracotomy. Cardiac deformation was measured and held nearly constant during changes in rate and duration. As opposed to changes accompanying manual CPR, there was no change in perfusion pressures when duration was increased from 15% to 45% of the cycle at a constant rate of 60/min. There was, however, a significant increase in perfusion pressures when rate was increased from 60 to 150/min at a constant duration of 45%. Thus, vital organ perfusion pressures and flow during manual external chest compression are dependent on the duration of compression, but not on rates of 60 or 150/min. These data are similar to those observed for vest CPR, where intrathoracic pressure is manipulated without sternal displacement, but opposite of those observed for direct cardiac compression.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
心肺复苏(CPR)期间的血流是由胸内压力波动还是直接心脏按压引起的,这一问题仍存在争议。从模型分析来看,由胸内压力波动引起的血流在很大范围内对按压频率不敏感,但取决于施加的力量和按压持续时间。然而,如果心脏的直接按压起主要作用,那么血流应取决于按压频率和力量,但超过某个阈值后,对按压持续时间不敏感。按压频率和持续时间变化所产生的这些血流动力学差异,构成了确定CPR期间的血流是由胸内压力波动还是直接心脏按压引起的基础。在8只体重21至32千克、诱导室颤后的麻醉犬身上研究了徒手CPR。未对胸部进行手术操作。用放射性微球测定心肌和脑血流。在胸骨峰值力量几乎恒定(378至426牛顿)的情况下,当按压持续时间从周期的14±1%增加到46±3%、频率为60次/分钟时,血流显著增加。然而,在按压持续时间恒定的情况下,频率从60次/分钟增加到150次/分钟后,血流没有变化。接下来,在另外8只犬身上,将徒手CPR的血流动力学与同时进行通气的背心充气(背心CPR)所产生的血流动力学进行了比较。背心CPR改变胸内压力但不直接按压心脏,因为胸骨位移小于0.8厘米。在频率为150次/分钟、持续时间和右心房峰值压力相似的情况下,徒手CPR和背心CPR产生的血流和灌注压力相似。最后,将徒手CPR的血流动力学与开胸后直接心脏按压的血流动力学进行了比较。在频率和持续时间变化期间测量并使心脏变形保持几乎恒定。与徒手CPR时的变化相反,在频率恒定为60次/分钟的情况下,持续时间从周期的15%增加到45%时,灌注压力没有变化。然而,在持续时间恒定为45%的情况下,频率从60次/分钟增加到150次/分钟时,灌注压力显著增加。因此,徒手胸外按压期间重要器官的灌注压力和血流取决于按压持续时间,而不取决于60次/分钟或150次/分钟的频率。这些数据与在背心CPR中观察到的数据相似,在背心CPR中胸内压力被改变而胸骨没有位移,但与直接心脏按压中观察到的数据相反。(摘要截取自400字)