Cohen T J, Tucker K J, Redberg R F, Lurie K G, Chin M C, Dutton J P, Scheinman M M, Schiller N B, Callaham M L
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Am Heart J. 1992 Nov;124(5):1145-50. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(92)90393-a.
Chest compression is an important part of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but it only aids circulation during a portion of the compression cycle and has been shown to only minimally increase blood flow to vital organs. The purpose of this study was to quantitate the short-term hemodynamic effects of CPR with a hand-held suction device that incorporates both active compression and decompression of the chest. The suction device was applied to the middle of the sternum and compared with standard manual CPR in eight nonventilated anesthetized dogs. Coronary perfusion pressure, systolic and diastolic aortic pressures, right atrial diastolic pressure, and the velocity time integral (an analog of cardiac output), which were obtained by means of transesophageal pulsed wave Doppler echocardiography from the main pulmonary artery, were measured every 30 seconds during CPR. Minute ventilation was measured over the last minute of each CPR technique. Both active compression-decompression CPR and standard CPR were sequentially performed for 2 minutes in random order 30 seconds after induced ventricular fibrillation. The CPR techniques consisted of 100 compressions per minute, with a compression depth of 1.5 to 2 inches and a 50% duty cycle. Coronary perfusion pressure, velocity time integral (cardiac output analog), minute ventilation, and systolic arterial pressure were all significantly improved by active compression-decompression CPR when compared with standard CPR. We conclude that active compression-decompression CPR is a simple technique that appears to improve coronary perfusion pressure, systolic arterial pressure, cardiac output, and minute ventilation in nonventilated animals when compared with standard CPR.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
胸外按压是心肺复苏(CPR)的重要组成部分,但它仅在按压周期的一部分时间内辅助循环,并且已被证明对重要器官的血流增加作用极小。本研究的目的是定量评估一种结合了胸部主动按压和减压功能的手持式吸引装置进行心肺复苏的短期血流动力学效应。将该吸引装置应用于胸骨中部,并与八只未通气的麻醉犬的标准徒手心肺复苏进行比较。在心肺复苏期间,每隔30秒通过经食管脉冲波多普勒超声心动图测量主肺动脉的冠状动脉灌注压、主动脉收缩压和舒张压、右心房舒张压以及速度时间积分(心输出量的类似物)。在每种心肺复苏技术的最后一分钟测量分钟通气量。在诱发心室颤动30秒后,按随机顺序依次进行主动按压-减压心肺复苏和标准心肺复苏,各持续2分钟。心肺复苏技术包括每分钟100次按压,按压深度为1.5至2英寸,占空比为50%。与标准心肺复苏相比,主动按压-减压心肺复苏可显著提高冠状动脉灌注压、速度时间积分(心输出量类似物)、分钟通气量和收缩期动脉压。我们得出结论,与标准心肺复苏相比,主动按压-减压心肺复苏是一种简单的技术,似乎能改善未通气动物的冠状动脉灌注压、收缩期动脉压、心输出量和分钟通气量。(摘要截短于250字)