Kurniawan Mohammad, Ramli Yetty, Putri Nadira Deanda, Harris Salim, Rasyid Al, Mesiano Taufik, Hidayat Rakhmad
Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Stem Cell Medical Technology Integrated Service Unit, Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo National Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Asian Biomed (Res Rev News). 2024 Oct 31;18(5):194-203. doi: 10.2478/abm-2024-0027. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Stroke represents a significant global health issue, primarily in the form of ischemic stroke. Despite the availability of therapeutic interventions, the recovery from chronic stroke, occurring 3 months post-initial stroke, poses substantial challenges. A promising avenue for post-acute stroke patients is mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy, which is derived from various sources and is globally recognized as the most utilized and extensively studied stem cell therapy. This systematic review, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, aims to synthesize evidence regarding the impact of MSCs therapy on patients with chronic ischemic stroke. Employing an advanced search strategy across databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrial.gov, a total of 70 studies were identified, with 4studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Although positive outcomes were observed in terms of efficacy and safety, certain limitations, such as small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, and the absence of placebo groups, undermine the overall strength of the evidence. It is crucial to address these limitations in future research, highlighting the importance of larger sample sizes, standardized methodologies, and comparative trials to improve the assessment of MSCs' efficacy and safety. Moving forward, key priorities include exploring underlying mechanisms, determining optimal administration modes and dosages, and conducting comparative trials. By addressing these aspects, we can propel MSCs therapies toward greater efficacy, safety, and applicability across diverse patient populations.
中风是一个重大的全球健康问题,主要表现为缺血性中风。尽管有治疗干预措施,但初始中风3个月后发生的慢性中风的恢复仍面临巨大挑战。对于急性中风后患者来说,一个有前景的途径是间充质干细胞(MSCs)疗法,这种疗法来源多样,是全球公认使用最多且研究最广泛的干细胞疗法。本系统评价遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南,旨在综合有关MSCs疗法对慢性缺血性中风患者影响的证据。通过在PubMed、PubMed Central、谷歌学术、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)和ClinicalTrial.gov等数据库中采用先进的检索策略,共识别出70项研究,其中4项研究符合纳入标准。尽管在疗效和安全性方面观察到了积极结果,但某些局限性,如样本量小、研究异质性以及缺乏安慰剂组,削弱了证据的整体强度。在未来研究中解决这些局限性至关重要,这凸显了更大样本量、标准化方法和比较试验对于改善MSCs疗效和安全性评估的重要性。展望未来,关键优先事项包括探索潜在机制、确定最佳给药方式和剂量以及进行比较试验。通过解决这些方面的问题,我们可以推动MSCs疗法在不同患者群体中实现更高的疗效、安全性和适用性。