Dupuy Claire, Van Ingelgom Virginie
ISPOLE, University of Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
F.R.S.-FNRS, Brussels, Belgium.
J Eur Public Policy. 2023 Dec 23;31(4):1126-1152. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2288236. eCollection 2024.
The implications of the dilemma attributed to Mair between the responsiveness of political actors and their responsibility is considered from the perspective of citizens. The article analyses citizens' understandings of political actors' responsiveness and responsibility in their discourses on the SEGEU. We provide an in-depth abductive secondary analysis of three qualitative datasets collected in Belgium and France between 2005 and 2019. Most participants frame responsibility and responsiveness in terms that are close to Mair's definitions. However, some challenge the principle of responsibility and elaborate an alternative understanding directed towards achieving the common good. Nevertheless, as participants agree that political actors are not responsive to them, but rather to market actors, there is no evident dilemma. Our analysis shows that political actors' capacity for agency and choice, frames participants' understandings of responsiveness and responsibility. This result becomes the basis for a reconceptualisation of the notion of responsiveness and representation from a citizen perspective.
从公民的角度考虑了归因于迈尔的政治行为者的响应性与其责任之间困境的影响。本文分析了公民在关于SEGEU的论述中对政治行为者的响应性和责任的理解。我们对2005年至2019年期间在比利时和法国收集的三个定性数据集进行了深入的归纳性二次分析。大多数参与者对责任和响应性的界定与迈尔的定义相近。然而,一些人对责任原则提出质疑,并阐述了一种旨在实现共同利益的替代性理解。尽管如此,由于参与者一致认为政治行为者并非对他们做出响应,而是对市场行为者做出响应,所以不存在明显的困境。我们的分析表明,政治行为者的行动和选择能力塑造了参与者对响应性和责任的理解。这一结果成为从公民视角重新概念化响应性和代表性概念的基础。