Clinical RNA sequencing clarifies variants of uncertain significance identified by prior testing.

PURPOSE

Sequencing-based genetic testing often identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS) or fails to detect pathogenic variants altogether. We evaluated the utility of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to clarify VUS or identify missing variants in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Over a 2-year period, genetics providers at a single institution referred 26 cases for clinical RNA-seq. Cases had either no candidate variant identified by prior testing or a VUS suspected to impact splicing or expression. A committee reviewed each submission to ensure it met study criteria.

RESULTS

Among 26 cases, 8 could not be sequenced because of poor expression in an accessible tissue, 2 did not meet inclusion criteria, 3 were solved prior to collection, and 4 families declined participation or did not complete sample collection. For the 9 cases sequenced, the clinical laboratory reported two positive, four negative, and three "indeterminate." For all three indeterminate cases, original RNA-seq data was manually evaluated and deemed explanatory.

CONCLUSION

Clinical RNA-seq can clarify VUS, especially splice variants, but laboratory-specific interpretation guidelines may lead to indeterminate results. Identifying individuals likely to benefit from RNA-seq and providing appropriate counseling poses unique challenges.