Nguyen Anna, Heitmann Gabby Barratt, Mertens Andrew, Ashraf Sania, Rahman Md Ziaur, Ali Shahjahan, Rahman Mahbub, Arnold Benjamin F, Grembi Jessica A, Lin Audrie, Ercumen Ayse, Benjamin-Chung Jade
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 15:2024.10.13.24315425. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.13.24315425.
Low-cost, household-level water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) and nutrition interventions can reduce pediatric antibiotic use, but the mechanism through which interventions reduce antibiotic use has not been investigated.
We conducted a causal mediation analysis using data from the WASH Benefits Bangladesh cluster-randomized trial (NCT01590095). Among a subsample of children within the WSH, nutrition, nutrition+WSH, and controls arms (N=1,409), we recorded caregiver-reported antibiotic use at ages 14 and 28 months and collected stool at age 14 months. Mediators included caregiver-reported child diarrhea, acute respiratory infection (ARI), and fever; and enteric pathogen carriage in stool measured by qPCR. Models controlled for mediator-outcome confounders.
The receipt of any WSH or nutrition intervention reduced antibiotic use in the past month by 5.5 percentage points (95% CI 1.2, 9.9) through all pathways, from 49.5% (95% CI 45.9%, 53.0%) in the control group to 45.0 % (95% CI 42.7%, 47.2%) in the pooled intervention group. Interventions reduced antibiotic use by 0.6 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.3) through reduced diarrhea, 0.7 percentage points (95% CI 0.1, 1.5) through reduced ARI with fever, and 1.8 percentage points (95% CI 0.5, 3.5) through reduced prevalence of enteric viruses. Interventions reduced antibiotic use through any mediator by 2.5 percentage points (95% CI 0.2, 5.3).
Our findings bolster a causal interpretation that WASH and nutrition interventions reduced pediatric antibiotic use through reduced infections in a rural, low-income population.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
低成本的家庭层面的水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)及营养干预措施可减少儿科抗生素的使用,但干预措施减少抗生素使用的机制尚未得到研究。
我们利用来自孟加拉国WASH效益整群随机试验(NCT01590095)的数据进行了因果中介分析。在水、环境卫生与个人卫生(WSH)、营养、营养+WSH和对照组的儿童子样本(N = 1409)中,我们记录了照护者报告的14个月和28个月大时的抗生素使用情况,并在14个月大时收集了粪便。中介因素包括照护者报告的儿童腹泻、急性呼吸道感染(ARI)和发烧;以及通过定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)测量的粪便中肠道病原体携带情况。模型对中介因素与结果之间的混杂因素进行了控制。
接受任何水、环境卫生与个人卫生或营养干预措施通过所有途径使过去一个月的抗生素使用减少了5.5个百分点(95%置信区间1.2,9.9),从对照组的49.5%(95%置信区间45.9%,53.0%)降至合并干预组的45.0%(95%置信区间42.7%,47.2%)。干预措施通过减少腹泻使抗生素使用减少了0.6个百分点(95%置信区间0.1,1.3),通过减少伴有发烧的急性呼吸道感染使抗生素使用减少了0.7个百分点(95%置信区间0.1,1.5),通过降低肠道病毒感染率使抗生素使用减少了1.8个百分点(95%置信区间0.5,3.5)。干预措施通过任何中介因素使抗生素使用减少了2.5个百分点(95%置信区间0.2,5.3)。
我们的研究结果支持了一种因果解释,即水、环境卫生和营养干预措施通过减少农村低收入人群的感染来减少儿科抗生素的使用。
比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会、美国国立过敏和传染病研究所。