• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素及不明原因变异:一项基于人群的横断面分析。

Predictors and Unexplained Variability of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis.

作者信息

Hong Christopher X, Fairchild Pamela S, Schmidt Payton C, Triebwasser Jourdan E

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, University Hospital South, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr., L4011, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05967-1. Epub 2024 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05967-1
PMID:39485526
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) and assess the predictive power of clinical risk factors for OASIs, both individually and collectively, using a US population-based birth registry.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using birth data from the National Vital Statistics System from 2016 to 2021. All vaginal births were included, excluding those with unspecified delivery route or perineal laceration status. Logistic regression models assessed the relationship between potential clinical predictors, determined a priori based on existing literature and inclusion in the registry data, and OASIs. The pseudo-R (pR), which indicates the proportion of variability in OASIs explained by the model out of 100%, was used to compare the predictive strength of different clinical factors.

RESULTS

A total of 15,413,957 vaginal births were analyzed. The overall incidence of OASIs was 1.1%. The factors that exhibited the highest predictive capability for OASIs were vaginal parity (pR 5.8%) and operative birth (pR 4.8%), followed by infant weight (pR 1.5%); all other factors had a pR of 0.5% or lower. The final multivariable logistic regression model had a pR of 11.8%.

CONCLUSION

Vaginal parity and operative birth are among the most predictive clinical risk factors for OASIs, each accounting for approximately 5% of the variation in OASI outcomes. However, a significant portion of OASI occurrences remains unexplained by clinical risk factors alone. Future research focusing on the mechanisms of OASIs will be crucial for identifying high-risk patients and developing targeted interventions to reduce the risk of OASIs.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是利用美国基于人群的出生登记系统,确定产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIs)的发生率,并评估临床风险因素对OASIs的预测能力,包括单独评估和综合评估。

方法

我们使用了2016年至2021年国家生命统计系统的出生数据进行横断面研究。纳入所有阴道分娩,排除分娩途径或会阴裂伤状态未明确的情况。逻辑回归模型评估了潜在临床预测因素(根据现有文献和登记数据中的纳入标准预先确定)与OASIs之间的关系。伪R(pR)用于比较不同临床因素的预测强度,它表示模型解释的OASIs变异性在100%中所占的比例。

结果

共分析了15413957例阴道分娩。OASIs的总体发生率为1.1%。对OASIs表现出最高预测能力的因素是经阴道分娩次数(pR 5.8%)和手术分娩(pR 4.8%),其次是婴儿体重(pR 1.5%);所有其他因素的pR为0.5%或更低。最终的多变量逻辑回归模型的pR为11.8%。

结论

经阴道分娩次数和手术分娩是OASIs最具预测性的临床风险因素,每个因素约占OASI结局变异的5%。然而,仅临床风险因素无法解释很大一部分OASI的发生情况。未来聚焦于OASIs机制的研究对于识别高危患者和制定针对性干预措施以降低OASIs风险至关重要。

相似文献

1
Predictors and Unexplained Variability of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Analysis.产科肛门括约肌损伤的预测因素及不明原因变异:一项基于人群的横断面分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jan;36(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05967-1. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
2
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.预测现代产科人群中的产科肛门括约肌损伤
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
3
Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries following breech compared to cephalic vaginal births.臀位分娩与头位分娩相比,产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的发生率。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 4;23(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05595-5.
4
An obstetric sphincter injury risk identification system (OSIRIS): is this a clinically useful tool?一种产科括约肌损伤风险识别系统(OSIRIS):这是一种临床有用的工具吗?
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Mar;28(3):367-374. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3125-2. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
5
Prevalence and associated factors of maternal birth trauma following vaginal delivery at University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, North-West Ethiopia, 2022.2022 年,在埃塞俄比亚西北部贡德尔大学综合专科医院,阴道分娩后产妇分娩创伤的流行情况及相关因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jun 27;24(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06635-4.
6
Is episiotomy worthwile to prevent obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery in nulliparous women?对于未生育过的女性,在阴道助产术中行会阴切开术以预防产科肛门括约肌损伤是否值得?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jan;232:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
7
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
8
Obstetric anal sphincter injury and incontinence 15-23 years after vaginal delivery.阴道分娩后15至23年的产科肛门括约肌损伤与失禁
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Aug;95(8):941-7. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12898. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury after a successful multicentre interventional programme.产科肛门括约肌损伤的危险因素:一项成功的多中心干预项目后的分析。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):83-91. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12274. Epub 2013 May 20.
10
Modifiable risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injury in primiparous women: a population-based cohort study.初产妇产科肛门括约肌损伤的可改变危险因素:基于人群的队列研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;210(1):59.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.043. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it?阴道分娩期间的盆底损伤会改变生活且可预防:对此我们能做些什么?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3):279-294.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1253. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
Changes in Prenatal Care Utilization:United States, 2019-2021.产前保健利用的变化:美国,2019-2021 年。
Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2023 May;72(4):1-14.
3
Instruments for assisted vaginal birth.用于辅助阴道分娩的器械。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 24;9(9):CD005455. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005455.pub3.
4
Achilles Tendon Rupture: Mechanisms of Injury, Principles of Rehabilitation and Return to Play.跟腱断裂:损伤机制、康复原则及重返运动
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020 Dec 17;5(4):95. doi: 10.3390/jfmk5040095.
5
Assisted Vaginal Birth: Green-top Guideline No. 26.阴道助产:绿皮书指南第26号。
BJOG. 2020 Aug;127(9):e70-e112. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16092. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
6
Wexner score and quality of life in women with obstetric anal sphincter injury.产科肛门括约肌损伤女性的 Wexner 评分与生活质量。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Jun;31(6):1115-1121. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-04134-1. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
7
Validation of Severe Maternal Morbidity on the US Certificate of Live Birth.美国出生证明上严重孕产妇发病情况的验证
Epidemiology. 2018 Jul;29(4):e31-e32. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000828.
8
Prospective evaluation of the safety and feasibility of a pelvic floor dilator during active labor.活跃期分娩时盆底扩张器安全性与可行性的前瞻性评估。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Oct;29(10):1485-1492. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3555-0. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
The effectiveness of mediolateral episiotomy in preventing obstetric anal sphincter injuries during operative vaginal delivery: a ten-year analysis of a national registry.会阴侧切术在预防阴道助产分娩时产科肛门括约肌损伤中的有效性:一项基于国家登记处的十年分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):407-413. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3422-4. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
10
Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients.1994年至2013年期间,急性跟腱断裂的发病率不断上升,而手术治疗明显减少。一项针对33160名患者的全国性登记研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Dec;24(12):3730-3737. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3544-5. Epub 2015 Feb 20.