• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TGI-SR+在法语人群中的有效性:来自魁北克和比利时的见解。

Validity of the TGI-SR+ in Francophone populations: Insights from Quebec and Belgium.

作者信息

Cherblanc Jacques, Côté Isabelle, Boever Camille, Zech Emmanuelle

机构信息

Département des sciences humaines et sociales, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (UQAC), Saguenay, Québec, Canada.

Institut de recherche en sciences psychologiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgique.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2024 Nov 1:1-11. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2024.2420882.

DOI:10.1080/07481187.2024.2420882
PMID:39485828
Abstract

The loss of a significant person can lead to a broad spectrum of responses. While most individuals gradually recover within a year, a minority develop Prolonged Grief Disorder (PGD). The Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Plus (TGI-SR+) was recently developed to ensure that the original scale (TGI-SR) still accurately assesses PGD in line with the latest diagnostic standards of the DSM-5-TR and ICD-11. This study aimed to validate the TGI-SR+ within two French-speaking cohorts: 276 French-Canadian and 469 Belgian participants. Data were collected through an online survey in 2022. Confirmatory factor analysis resulted in a 4-factor model for the TGI-SR+ total scale, but high inter-item correlations favored a 1-factor solution. A 1-factor model was found for the DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 PGD scores. Convergent validity with mental health disorder, depression, and post-traumatic growth, and known-group validity were confirmed. The findings endorse the TGI-SR+ as a valid tool for detecting potential PGD.

摘要

重要人物的离世可能会引发一系列广泛的反应。虽然大多数人在一年内会逐渐恢复,但少数人会患上持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)。创伤性悲伤量表自我报告升级版(TGI-SR+)最近被开发出来,以确保原始量表(TGI-SR)仍能根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)和《国际疾病分类》第11版(ICD-11)的最新诊断标准准确评估PGD。本研究旨在验证TGI-SR+在两个说法语的队列中的有效性:276名法裔加拿大参与者和469名比利时参与者。数据于2022年通过在线调查收集。验证性因素分析得出TGI-SR+总量表的四因素模型,但项目间的高相关性支持单因素解决方案。在DSM-5-TR和ICD-11的PGD评分中发现了单因素模型。与心理健康障碍、抑郁症和创伤后成长的收敛效度以及已知群体效度得到了证实。研究结果认可TGI-SR+作为检测潜在PGD的有效工具。

相似文献

1
Validity of the TGI-SR+ in Francophone populations: Insights from Quebec and Belgium.TGI-SR+在法语人群中的有效性:来自魁北克和比利时的见解。
Death Stud. 2024 Nov 1:1-11. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2024.2420882.
2
The Norwegian traumatic grief inventory-self report plus (TGI-SR+): a psychometric evaluation in traumatically bereaved people.挪威创伤后悲伤量表自我报告版加项(TGI-SR+):创伤性丧亲者的心理测量评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2391248. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2391248. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
3
The ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief criteria: Validation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus using exploratory factor analysis and item response theory.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5-TR 延长哀伤标准:使用探索性因子分析和项目反应理论验证创伤后哀伤量表自评版》
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022 Nov;29(6):1950-1962. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2765. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+) in Chinese Bereaved People.中文丧亲人群创伤后悲伤量表自评加项(TGI-SR+)的心理测量评估。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2024 Sep-Oct;31(5):e3066. doi: 10.1002/cpp.3066.
5
Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+).DSM-5 持续性复杂丧亲障碍和 DSM-5-TR 及 ICD-11 延长哀伤障碍的有效测量:创伤后悲伤量表-自我报告加项(TGI-SR+)。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the Swedish Traumatic Grief Inventory Self-Report Plus (TGI-SR+) in bereaved parents.瑞典创伤性悲伤量表自我报告升级版(TGI-SR+)在丧亲父母中的心理测量学评估
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023 Oct 23. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2922.
7
The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Clinician Administered: A psychometric evaluation of a new interview for ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder severity and probable caseness.创伤性悲伤量表-临床医生施测版:对一种用于评估国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中延长悲伤障碍严重程度及可能病例的新访谈工具的心理测量学评价
J Affect Disord. 2023 Jun 1;330:188-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
DSM-5-TR prolonged grief disorder and DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder are related, yet distinct: confirmatory factor analyses in traumatically bereaved people.DSM-5-TR 延长哀伤障碍与 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍相关,但又不同:创伤性丧亲人群中的验证性因子分析。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Dec 9;12(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2000131. eCollection 2021.
9
Prolonged grief disorder in ICD-11 and DSM-5-TR: differences in prevalence and diagnostic criteria.《国际疾病分类第11版》和《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版修订版》中的持续性悲伤障碍:患病率及诊断标准的差异
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Feb 8;15:1266132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1266132. eCollection 2024.
10
Turkish Version of the Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report (TGI-SR): Validity and reliability.创伤后悲伤量表自我报告土耳其语版(TGI-SR):效度和信度。
Death Stud. 2022;46(6):1481-1489. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2020.1850551. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between one's social life and symptoms of prolonged grief following a traumatic loss: an ecological momentary assessment study.创伤性丧失后个人社交生活与持续性悲伤症状之间的关联:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2515705. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2515705. Epub 2025 Jun 23.