Suppr超能文献

相似干扰项增加了工作记忆中汉字选择与更新的负担。

Similarity Distractors Increase the Burden of Chinese Character Selection and Updating in Working Memory.

作者信息

Li Hongli, Zhao Xin

机构信息

Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

J Cogn Neurosci. 2025 Feb 1;37(2):317-333. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02271.

Abstract

Attentional mechanisms are the primary processes for performing working memory (WM) tasks and can prevent distractors from interfering with the content representations stored in WM. However, our understanding of the mechanisms by which attention affects WM remains limited. As such, we analyzed ERPs of the character n-back task to investigate Chinese character selection, updating, and maintenance in WM. In Experiment 1, we collected electroencephalography data from 27 participants aged 18-25 years to explore the influence of false-character interference and symbol interference on a neural activity in the character n-back task. The results suggest that RT was longer in the false-character interference condition. The N2pc and P300 amplitudes were smaller; however, the slow wave amplitude did not differ significantly. In Experiment 2, we used a single-symbol interference and a multiple-symbol interference to establish whether the number of interferences affected the neural activity in the character n-back task. Thirty participants (aged 19-25 years) took part in the experiment. The findings imply that a longer RT and a larger N2pc amplitude occurred in the multiple-symbol interference condition, but not in the P300 and slow wave conditions. Our findings indicate that distractors that are similar to characters may produce greater interference in character recognition and affect the subsequent updating, whereas the number of distractors may only interfere with early character selection, but not with updating and maintenance phases.

摘要

注意机制是执行工作记忆(WM)任务的主要过程,并且可以防止干扰物干扰存储在WM中的内容表征。然而,我们对注意力影响WM的机制的理解仍然有限。因此,我们分析了字符n-back任务的事件相关电位(ERP),以研究汉字在WM中的选择、更新和维持。在实验1中,我们收集了27名18至25岁参与者的脑电图数据,以探究假字干扰和符号干扰对字符n-back任务中神经活动的影响。结果表明,在假字干扰条件下反应时间更长。N2pc和P300波幅更小;然而,慢波幅没有显著差异。在实验2中,我们使用单符号干扰和多符号干扰来确定干扰数量是否会影响字符n-back任务中的神经活动。30名(19至25岁)参与者参加了该实验。研究结果表明,在多符号干扰条件下出现了更长的反应时间和更大的N2pc波幅,但在P300和慢波条件下并非如此。我们的研究结果表明,与字符相似的干扰物可能在字符识别中产生更大的干扰,并影响后续更新,而干扰物的数量可能仅干扰早期的字符选择,而不影响更新和维持阶段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验