Suppr超能文献

超早期微创脑出血清除术中腔内出血的处理

Management of intracavitary bleeding during ultra-early minimally invasive intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation.

作者信息

Ali Muhammad, Smith Colton, Vasan Vikram, Schuldt Braxton, Downes Margaret, Odland Ian, Murtaza-Ali Muhammad, Lin Anthony, Rossitto Christina P, Dullea Jonathan, Hrabarchuk Eugene, Kalagara Roshini, Ezzat Bahie, Vasa Devarshi, Schupper Alexander J, Hardigan Trevor, Asghar Nek, Majidi Shahram, Kellner Christopher P, Mocco J

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

2Department of Anthropology, State University of New York at Binghamton; and.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 2024 Nov 1;142(4):1003-1013. doi: 10.3171/2024.6.JNS232985. Print 2025 Apr 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical evacuation of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) at early time points contributes to improved functional outcomes. However, ultra-early evacuation has been associated with postoperative rebleeding, a devastating complication that contributes to worse outcomes. Minimally invasive endoscopic techniques allow for intraoperative management of active bleeding, potentially allowing for safe and effective hemostasis at ultra-early time points. The authors proposed and prospectively assigned an intraoperative grading scale that quantified the severity of bleeding encountered intraoperatively. They hypothesized that ultra-early evacuation would correlate to increased intraoperative bleeding but not postoperative rebleeding or worse long-term clinical outcomes in a cohort of patients undergoing minimally invasive endoscopic evacuation.

METHODS

Patients presenting to a large healthcare system with spontaneous supratentorial ICH were triaged to a central hospital for potential surgical evacuation. Inclusion criteria for evacuation included age ≥ 18 years, premorbid mRS score ≤ 3, hematoma volume ≥ 15 mL, and presenting National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥ 6. A 5-point scale was developed and prospectively applied to grade the severity of bleeding encountered intraoperatively. A score of 1 indicated no active intraoperative bleeding. A score of 2 indicated minimal bleeding treated with irrigation alone. A score of 3 indicated bleeding that required cauterization to control. A score of 4 indicated bleeding that required irrigation or cauterization for at least 15 minutes to achieve hemostasis. A score of 5 indicated bleeding that required irrigation or cauterization for at least 1 hour.

RESULTS

The authors evaluated 142 consecutive patients. The median bleeding score was 2 (IQR 2-4). Greater preoperative volume, concomitant intraventricular hemorrhage, and earlier time to evacuation were independently associated with increased bleeding score. Specifically, ultra-early evacuation within 5 hours was independently associated with a 2.4-point greater bleeding score as compared with evacuation thereafter (β = 2.41, 95% CI 1.44-3.38; p < 0.0001). Despite having higher intraoperative bleeding scores, patients undergoing ultra-early evacuation did not have an increased likelihood of postoperative rebleeding (14% vs 3%, p = 0.23), 30-day mortality (0% vs 6%, p = 0.99), or worse median 6-month mRS scores (4 [IQR 2-5] vs 4 [IQR 3-5], p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultra-early evacuation within 5 hours of ictus is associated with increased intraoperative bleeding but not postoperative rebleeding or worse clinical outcomes. These findings suggest that the benefits of ultra-early evacuation can be explored without an increased risk of postoperative rebleeding when utilizing a minimally invasive endoscopic technique with good intraoperative visualization, active irrigation for targeted tamponade, and direct cauterization of bleeding vessels.

摘要

目的

在早期对脑出血(ICH)进行手术清除有助于改善功能预后。然而,超早期清除与术后再出血相关,这是一种具有毁灭性的并发症,会导致更差的预后。微创内镜技术可在术中处理活动性出血,有可能在超早期实现安全有效的止血。作者提出并前瞻性地制定了一种术中分级量表,用于量化术中遇到的出血严重程度。他们假设,在一组接受微创内镜清除术的患者中,超早期清除与术中出血增加相关,但与术后再出血或更差的长期临床预后无关。

方法

在一个大型医疗系统中出现自发性幕上脑出血的患者被分诊到中心医院进行可能的手术清除。清除的纳入标准包括年龄≥18岁、病前改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分≤3、血肿体积≥15 mL以及就诊时美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≥6。制定了一个5分制量表,并前瞻性地应用于对术中遇到的出血严重程度进行分级。1分表示术中无活动性出血。2分表示仅用冲洗即可处理的少量出血。3分表示需要烧灼止血的出血。4分表示需要冲洗或烧灼至少15分钟才能实现止血的出血。5分表示需要冲洗或烧灼至少1小时的出血。

结果

作者评估了142例连续患者。出血评分中位数为2(四分位间距2 - 4)。术前血肿体积更大、合并脑室内出血以及更早进行清除与出血评分增加独立相关。具体而言,与之后进行清除相比,在发病5小时内进行超早期清除与出血评分高2.4分独立相关(β = 2.41,95%置信区间1.44 - 3.38;p < 0.0001)。尽管术中出血评分较高,但接受超早期清除的患者术后再出血的可能性并未增加(14%对3%,p = 0.23),30天死亡率也未增加(0%对6%,p = 0.99),6个月mRS评分中位数也未变差(4[四分位间距2 - 5]对4[四分位间距3 - 5],p = 0.51)。

结论

发病5小时内进行超早期清除与术中出血增加相关,但与术后再出血或更差的临床预后无关。这些发现表明,当采用具有良好术中视野、积极冲洗以进行靶向压迫以及直接烧灼出血血管的微创内镜技术时,可以探索超早期清除的益处,而不会增加术后再出血的风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验