Schroën Karin, Shen Xuefeng, Hasyyati Fathinah Islami, Deshpande Siddharth, van der Gucht Jasper
Wageningen University, Department of Agrotechnology & Food Sciences, Laboratory of Food Process Engineering, Bornse Weilanden 9, 6708 WG Wageningen, the Netherlands..
Wageningen University, Department of Agrotechnology & Food Sciences, Laboratory of Physical Chemistry and Soft Matter, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024 Dec;334:103321. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103321. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
We noticed that in literature, the term Pickering emulsion (PE) is used as soon as ingredients contain particles, and in this review, we ask ourselves if that is done rightfully so. The basic behavior taking place in particle-stabilized emulsions leads to the conclusion that the desorption energy of particles is generally high making particles highly suited to physically stabilize emulsions. Exceptions are particles with extreme contact angles or systems with very low interfacial tension. Particles used in food and biobased applications are soft, can deform when adsorbed, and most probably have molecules extending into both phases thus increasing desorption energy. Besides, surface-active components will be present either in the ingredients or generated by the emulsification process used, which will reduce the energy of desorption, either by reduced interfacial tension, or changes in the contact angle. In this paper, we describe the relative relevance of these aspects, and how to distinguish them in practice. Practical food emulsions may derive part of their stability from the presence of particles, but most likely have mixed interfaces, and are thus not PEs. Especially when small particles are used to stabilize (sub)micrometer droplets, emulsions may become unstable upon receiving a heat treatment. Stability can be enhanced by connecting the particles or creating network that spans the product, albeit this goes beyond classical Pickering stabilization. Through the architecture of PEs, special functionalities can be created, such as reduction of lipid oxidation, and controlled release features.
我们注意到,在文献中,只要成分中含有颗粒就会使用“皮克林乳液(PE)”这一术语,在本综述中,我们不禁自问这样做是否合理。颗粒稳定乳液中发生的基本行为得出的结论是,颗粒的解吸能通常较高,这使得颗粒非常适合在物理上稳定乳液。例外情况是具有极端接触角的颗粒或界面张力非常低的体系。食品和生物基应用中使用的颗粒是软质的,吸附时会变形,并且很可能有分子延伸到两相中,从而增加解吸能。此外,表面活性成分要么存在于成分中,要么由所使用的乳化过程产生,这将通过降低界面张力或改变接触角来降低解吸能。在本文中,我们描述了这些方面的相对相关性,以及如何在实践中区分它们。实际的食品乳液可能部分稳定性源于颗粒的存在,但很可能具有混合界面,因此不是皮克林乳液。特别是当使用小颗粒来稳定(亚)微米级液滴时,乳液在接受热处理后可能会变得不稳定。通过连接颗粒或形成跨越产品的网络可以提高稳定性,尽管这超出了经典的皮克林稳定作用。通过皮克林乳液的结构,可以创造特殊功能,如减少脂质氧化和控制释放特性。