Suppr超能文献

分期双侧内镜下腕管松解术中清醒局部麻醉与局部区域神经阻滞的比较

Comparison of WALANT versus locoregional nerve block in staged bilateral endoscopic carpal tunnel release.

作者信息

Verrewaere Dries, Reyniers Pieter, Vandevivere Hanne, Stockmans Filip, Berghs Bart, Bonte Francis

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge and AZ Sint-Lucas, Bruges, Belgium.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge and AZ Sint-Lucas, Bruges, Belgium.

出版信息

Hand Surg Rehabil. 2024 Dec;43(6):101974. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2024.101974. Epub 2024 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Carpal tunnel release can be performed as open or endoscopic surgery. In WALANT (wide awake local anesthesia no tourniquet) a tourniquet is not used, ensuring less discomfort for the patient. In locoregional distal nerve block, on the other hand, a tourniquet is needed and can be painful. This raises the question as to which method of anesthesia is actually preferred for the patient and the surgeon. Patients undergoing staged bilateral carpal tunnel release present a unique opportunity to study this question.

METHODS

Fifteen patients were included in this prospective study. The primary endpoint was the preference for anesthesia type in patients and surgeons. Surgeon preference was based on the visibility and fluency of the procedure. Secondary endpoints for patients comprised pain scores for performing surgery and anesthesia and pain caused by the tourniquet.

RESULTS

Baseline demographic and clinical information was collected. There was no significant difference in pain for performing local anesthesia or surgery. Surgeons may find that performing endoscopic release under WALANT is more challenging, as visibility tends to be significantly poorer. The mean pain caused by the tourniquet used during the wrist block procedure was rated as 3.6. In both surgeries, 77% (10/13) of the patients preferred the WALANT anesthesia.

CONCLUSION

In general, endoscopic carpal tunnel release was better tolerated under WALANT than locoregional distal nerve block. Although statistical analysis showed no significant difference in visibility and fluency for the surgeon between the two anesthesia techniques, we do not recommend endoscopic release under WALANT due to the consistent report of reduced visibility in the surgical field. This limitation, likely related to the presence of anesthetic fluid, may have failed to reach statistical significance due to small sample size, but is nevertheless a considerable challenge in practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1B.

摘要

背景

腕管松解术可通过开放手术或内镜手术进行。在清醒局部麻醉无止血带(WALANT)技术中,不使用止血带,从而确保患者的不适感减轻。另一方面,在局部区域远端神经阻滞中,则需要使用止血带,且可能会引起疼痛。这就引发了一个问题,即对于患者和外科医生而言,哪种麻醉方法实际上更受青睐。接受分期双侧腕管松解术的患者为研究这个问题提供了一个独特的机会。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了15名患者。主要终点是患者和外科医生对麻醉类型的偏好。外科医生的偏好基于手术的可视性和流畅性。患者的次要终点包括手术和麻醉时的疼痛评分以及止血带引起的疼痛。

结果

收集了基线人口统计学和临床信息。局部麻醉或手术时的疼痛没有显著差异。外科医生可能会发现,在WALANT技术下进行内镜松解术更具挑战性,因为可视性往往明显较差。腕部阻滞过程中使用止血带引起的平均疼痛评分为3.6。在这两种手术中,77%(10/13)的患者更喜欢WALANT麻醉。

结论

总体而言,与局部区域远端神经阻滞相比,WALANT技术下的内镜腕管松解术耐受性更好。尽管统计分析显示两种麻醉技术对外科医生而言在可视性和流畅性方面没有显著差异,但由于手术视野可视性持续降低的报告,我们不建议在WALANT技术下进行内镜松解术。这种局限性可能与麻醉液的存在有关,由于样本量小,可能未达到统计学意义,但在实践中仍然是一个相当大的挑战。

证据级别

1B。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验