Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Jan;46(1):69.e1-69.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.07.023. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
The goal of this study was to determine whether the type of anesthesia (monitored anesthesia care [MAC] vs wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet technique [WALANT]) or the surgical technique (mini-open vs endoscopic) would affect patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, postoperative pain, or opioid use after carpal tunnel release (CTR). The hypothesis was that endoscopic and open CTR surgery would have the same patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, postoperative pain, and opioid use, but WALANT surgery would have higher patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, postoperative pain, and opioid use than MAC.
This prospective study examined all patients undergoing carpal tunnel surgery by 4 hand surgeons at our institution. Two surgeons perform primarily 1-incision endoscopic CTR and the other 2 perform mini-open CTR. Two surgeons perform all procedures under WALANT; the other 2 employ MAC with a local anesthetic. Postsurgical questionnaires were completed at the 2-week postoperative visit. Patients reported remaining pills, average pain, highest pain, lowest pain, and overall satisfaction with postoperative pain control.
A total of 93 patients underwent CTR by the 4 participating hand surgeons. Of these, 43 underwent open CTR and 50 underwent endoscopic CTR. Sixty-two were performed under MAC and 31 with WALANT. With regard to anesthesia type, overall there was 5.5 mean morphine equivalents (MME) less prescribed and an average of 3.6 MME more remaining on the first postoperative visit with WALANT compared with MAC. Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control was an average score of 7.9 for MAC and 7.4 for WALANT. With regard to surgical technique, overall, there was 15.2 MME less prescribed and an average of 1.03 MME more remaining on the first postoperative visit with endoscopic CTR compared with open CTR. Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control between endoscopic and open release demonstrated an average score of 7.1 and 8.0, respectively.
This study demonstrates minimal differences in opioid pain medication use, patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control, and pain scores in a comparison of surgical technique as well as anesthesia type.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
本研究旨在确定麻醉类型(监测麻醉护理[MAC]与清醒局部无止血带技术[WALANT])或手术技术(微创与内镜)是否会影响腕管松解术(CTR)后患者对术后疼痛控制、术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用的满意度。假设是内镜和开放式 CTR 手术在术后疼痛控制、术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用方面具有相同的患者满意度,但 WALANT 手术在术后疼痛控制、术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用方面的患者满意度将高于 MAC。
本前瞻性研究检查了我院 4 位手部外科医生进行的所有腕管手术患者。两位外科医生主要进行单切口内镜 CTR,另外两位进行微创 CTR。两位外科医生在 WALANT 下进行所有手术,另外两位使用局部麻醉剂进行 MAC。术后两周就诊时完成术后问卷调查。患者报告剩余药丸、平均疼痛、最高疼痛、最低疼痛和对术后疼痛控制的总体满意度。
共有 93 名患者由 4 名参与的手部外科医生进行 CTR。其中,43 名患者接受开放式 CTR,50 名患者接受内镜 CTR。62 例采用 MAC,31 例采用 WALANT。关于麻醉类型,总体而言,WALANT 比 MAC 少开 5.5 个平均吗啡当量(MME),首次术后就诊时剩余 3.6 个 MME。MAC 的术后疼痛控制满意度平均评分为 7.9,WALANT 为 7.4。关于手术技术,总体而言,内镜 CTR 比开放式 CTR 少开 15.2 个 MME,首次术后就诊时剩余 1.03 个 MME。内镜与开放式松解术的术后疼痛控制满意度分别为 7.1 和 8.0。
本研究表明,在手术技术和麻醉类型的比较中,阿片类药物疼痛药物使用、术后疼痛控制满意度和疼痛评分方面差异极小。
研究类型/证据水平:治疗性 IV。