Wang Ao, Zhou Xing-Yu, Lai Yun-Hui, Ma Lin-Zi, Zhang Jun, Huang Song-Yu, Zhang Xiao-Fei, Chen Pei-Ru, Wang An-Lan, Wang Zhe, Liu Yu-Dong, Chen Shi-Ling
Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, No 1838 Guangzhou Northern Road, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024 Dec;41(12):3433-3443. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03269-5. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
To evaluate whether co-treatment of repeated GnRHa triggers with GnRH antagonist protocols can improve the clinical outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer (IVF/ICSI-ET) procedures.
In this retrospective study, 712 Chinese Han women aged 20-42 undergoing autologous IVF/ICSI-ET with a flexible GnRH antagonist protocol were analyzed. The 735 cycles were split into the single (n = 238) and the repeated (n = 497) GnRHa groups. In the single GnRHa group, 0.2 mg of triptorelin was given for oocyte maturation, whereas in the repeated GnRHa group, two doses of 0.2 mg were administered 12 h apart. PSM design was used for a fair comparison. The main study outcomes included the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), live birth rate (LBR), good-quality embryo rate, and fertilization rate. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify all potential factors affecting clinical outcomes.
Post-PSM, analysis of 159 cycles per group showed the repeated GnRHa group outperforming the single GnRHa group in IVF fertilization rates (71.5% vs. 67.7%, P < 0.05) and good-quality embryo rate (47.1% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the repeated GnRHa group achieved higher CPR (72.6% vs. 53.4%, P < 0.05) and LBR (59.7% vs. 43.8%, P < 0.05) in FET cycles. Multivariate logistic regression indicated a significant negative correlation between the use of a single GnRHa trigger and both clinical pregnancy (OR = 0.382, P < 0.05) and live birth (OR = 0.518, P < 0.05).
Our study reported that individuals who received a repeated GnRHa trigger exhibited higher CPR and LBR during FET cycles compared to those who received a single dose GnRHa trigger.
评估重复使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRHa)扳机联合促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案是否能改善体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射与胚胎移植(IVF/ICSI-ET)程序的临床结局。
在这项回顾性研究中,分析了712名年龄在20至42岁之间、采用灵活促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案进行自体IVF/ICSI-ET的中国汉族女性。735个周期被分为单次(n = 238)和重复(n = 497)GnRHa组。在单次GnRHa组中,给予0.2 mg曲普瑞林用于卵母细胞成熟,而在重复GnRHa组中,相隔12小时给予两剂0.2 mg。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)设计进行公平比较。主要研究结局包括临床妊娠率(CPR)、活产率(LBR)、优质胚胎率和受精率。采用多因素逻辑回归分析来确定影响临床结局的所有潜在因素。
PSM后,每组159个周期的分析显示,重复GnRHa组在IVF受精率(71.5%对67.7%,P < 0.05)和优质胚胎率(47.1%对43.7%,P < 0.05)方面优于单次GnRHa组。此外,重复GnRHa组在冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期中实现了更高的CPR(72.6%对53.4%,P < 0.05)和LBR(59.7%对43.8%,P < 0.05)。多因素逻辑回归表明,单次使用GnRHa扳机与临床妊娠(OR = 0.382,P < 0.05)和活产(OR = 0.518,P < 0.05)均呈显著负相关。
我们的研究报告称,与接受单次剂量GnRHa扳机的个体相比,接受重复GnRHa扳机的个体在FET周期中表现出更高的CPR和LBR。