• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经阴道入路与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗阴道顶端脱垂的随机对照研究。

Conventional vaginal approach vs. transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for treating apical prolapse, a randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Galilee Medical Center- Women's Health Division, Nahariya, Israel; The Azrieli Faculty of Medicine of Bar-Ilan Universit, Safed, Israel.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel; Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Dec;303:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.032. Epub 2024 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.032
PMID:39488140
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal hysterectomy combined with uterosacral suspension (USLS) is a technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse. Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) has been described as an alternative minimal invasive approachfor treating various gynecological and non-gynecological pathologies. The aim was to compare the surgical time between conventional vaginal hysterectomy combined with USLS and vNOTES hysterectomy combined with USLS.

STUDY DESIGN

Multi-center randomized controlled trial performed 2019-2021 at Rambam Health Care Campus (Israel) and Imelda Hospital (Belgium). Thirty women underwent vNOTES procedures and 30 women underwent conventional vaginal procedures. The primary outcome was total surgical time. Secondary outcomes included hysterectomy time, USLS time, intraoperative bleeding, length of hospitalization, pain during the first 24 h postoperative, the need of analgesia, intraoperative and postoperative adverse events, and patient-reported outcomes questionnaires. Parametric statistical methods were used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

Compared to conventional vaginal procedures, vNOTES procedures were shorter in total surgical time (77 vs. 93 min, p = 0.004), hysterectomy time (26 vs 33 min, p < 0.001), and USLS time (20 vs 26 min. p = 0.02). Blood loss was higher in conventional vaginal compared to vNOTES surgery, as reflected by the mean blood loss estimate (143 vs 60 ml. p < 0.001) and the delta-hemoglobin (pre-operation minus the post-operation hemoglobin level (1.8 vs 1.2 ml/dL, p = 0.01). There was no difference between the groups regarding analgesics used, postoperative pain, surgical objective outcomes, and scores on patient-reported outcomes questionnaires. Adverse events were significantly more frequent in the conventional vaginal group than in the vNOTES group (p < 0.001 for intraoperative events and p = 0.05 for events that occurred in the follow-up time interval).

CONCLUSION

vNOTES hysterectomy with USLS has lower surgical times than conventional vaginal hysterectomy with USLS, lower blood loss and less adverse events. Other surgical objective and subjective outcomes were similar between the approaches.

摘要

目的

阴道子宫切除术联合子宫骶骨悬吊术(USLS)是治疗盆腔器官脱垂的一种技术。阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)已被描述为治疗各种妇科和非妇科疾病的一种替代微创方法。本研究旨在比较传统阴道子宫切除术联合 USLS 与 vNOTES 子宫切除术联合 USLS 的手术时间。

研究设计

2019 年至 2021 年在以色列 Rambam 医疗保健园区和比利时 Imelda 医院进行的多中心随机对照试验。30 名女性接受 vNOTES 手术,30 名女性接受传统阴道手术。主要结局是总手术时间。次要结局包括子宫切除术时间、USLS 时间、术中出血、住院时间、术后 24 小时内疼痛、镇痛需求、术中及术后不良事件以及患者报告的结果问卷。采用参数统计方法分析数据。

结果

与传统阴道手术相比,vNOTES 手术的总手术时间(77 分钟 vs. 93 分钟,p=0.004)、子宫切除术时间(26 分钟 vs. 33 分钟,p<0.001)和 USLS 时间(20 分钟 vs. 26 分钟,p=0.02)更短。传统阴道手术的术中出血量高于 vNOTES 手术,术中出血量估计均值(143 毫升 vs. 60 毫升,p<0.001)和 delta-血红蛋白(手术前减去手术后的血红蛋白水平(1.8 毫升/分升 vs. 1.2 毫升/分升,p=0.01)也有所升高。两组在使用的镇痛药、术后疼痛、手术客观结局以及患者报告的结果问卷评分方面无差异。传统阴道组的不良事件明显多于 vNOTES 组(术中事件 p<0.001,随访期间发生的事件 p=0.05)。

结论

vNOTES 子宫切除术联合 USLS 的手术时间短于传统阴道子宫切除术联合 USLS,出血量少,不良事件少。两种方法的其他手术客观和主观结局相似。

相似文献

1
Conventional vaginal approach vs. transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for treating apical prolapse, a randomized controlled study.经阴道入路与经阴道自然腔道内镜手术治疗阴道顶端脱垂的随机对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Dec;303:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.10.032. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
2
Comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery versus conventional surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension in patients who had concomitant vaginal hysterectomy for subtotal uterine prolapse.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与传统手术治疗阴道子宫次全切除术后伴中盆腔脏器脱垂患者子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术的比较。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2024 Jul;17(3):e13333. doi: 10.1111/ases.13333.
3
Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic versus conventional vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension for apical compartment prolapse.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与传统阴道子宫切除术加子宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗顶端盆腔器官脱垂的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 May;260:203-207. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.040. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Apical pelvic organ prolapse repair via vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: Initial experience from a tertiary care hospital.经阴道辅助自然腔道内镜手术治疗穹窿部盆腔器官脱垂:来自一家三级医院的初步经验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2021 Jul;14(3):346-352. doi: 10.1111/ases.12863. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Hysterectomy and Apical Suspension of the Vaginal Cuff to the Uterosacral Ligament.经阴道自然腔道内镜子宫切除术及阴道残端穹窿上提至主骶韧带悬吊术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Sep-Oct;26(6):1015. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.04.007. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
vNOTES versus Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Perioperative and Short-Term Outcomes.vNOTES 与腹腔镜子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂的比较:围手术期和短期结局。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Sep;35(9):1899-1908. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05907-z. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
7
Feasibility and Learning Curve of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for Hysterectomy and Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术行子宫切除术和宫骶韧带悬吊术治疗阴道顶端脱垂的可行性和学习曲线。
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e171-e176. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000875.
8
Vaginal hysterectomy and transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for uterosacral ligament suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: 53 cases of single-surgeon experience.经阴道子宫切除术和经阴道自然腔道内镜手术用于子宫骶骨韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂:单外科医生经验 53 例。
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2024 Nov 11;70(11):e20240759. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20240759. eCollection 2024.
9
Perioperative outcomes of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in hysterectomy: A comparative study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术与经脐腹腔镜单部位手术治疗子宫切除术的围手术期结局比较:一项对照研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Jun;165(3):1151-1157. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15323. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
10
Comparison of hysterectomy cases performed conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a paired sample cross-sectional study.比较经阴道辅助自然腔道内镜手术与传统腹腔镜下子宫切除术:配对样本的横断面研究。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;41(3):434-438. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1741523. Epub 2020 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) for Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Apical Compartment Prolapse: A Systematic Review.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES)治疗顶端盆腔脏器脱垂子宫骶韧带悬吊术的疗效:一项系统评价
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06195-x.
2
Analysis of the learning curve for transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in ovarian cystectomy.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术在卵巢囊肿切除术中的学习曲线分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 13;12:1629418. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1629418. eCollection 2025.
3
Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Risk-Reducing Gynecologic Cancer Surgery: A New Frontier in Hereditary Cancer Prevention.
降低妇科癌症手术风险中的经阴道自然腔道内镜手术(vNOTES):遗传性癌症预防的新前沿
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 6;14(12):4018. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124018.