Suppr超能文献

吉西他滨联合顺铂与多西他赛联合顺铂和氟尿嘧啶诱导化疗联合局部区域放疗治疗初治转移性鼻咽癌:一项单中心前瞻性 II 期临床试验。

Gemcitabine plus cisplatin versus docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy combined with locoregional radiotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A single center prospective phase II clinical trial.

机构信息

School of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, Guizhou, China.

Departemnt of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550001, China; Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2024 Dec;159:107087. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.107087. Epub 2024 Nov 3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This prospective clinical trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) versus docetaxel plus cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) as induction chemotherapy combined with locoregional radiotherapy in de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (dmNPC).

METHODS

146 dmNPC patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 4-6 cycles of GP (GP group) or TPF induction chemotherapy (TPF group) followed by locoregional radiotherapy (LRRT). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints consisted of progression-free survival(PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

As of data cutoff (May 31, 2024), the median follow-up time was 60.0 months (IQR 40.3-68.1). There is no significant difference in median OS (35.4 vs. 34.8 months, p = 0.2609) and PFS (15.8 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.2318) between the GP and TPF groups. No significant differences in ORR (65.8 % vs. 71.2 %, p = 0.476) and DCR (79.5 % vs. 82.2 %, p = 0.674) were observed between GP and TPF group too. Furthermore, the 5-year OS was 40.1 % (95 % CI, 29.6 %-54.2 %) in the GP group, compared with 27.2 % (95 % CI, 17.9 %-41.3 %) in the TPF group(HR = 0.79, 95 % CI, 0.53-1.20). However, the TPF group had higher incidences of grade 3-4 AEs such as neutropenia, leukopenia, nausea, and diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

The study indicates that 4-6 cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy combined with LRRT achieves a therapeutic effect comparable to the GP regimen with controllable safety.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性临床试验旨在比较吉西他滨联合顺铂(GP)与多西他赛联合顺铂和氟尿嘧啶(TPF)作为新诊断转移性鼻咽癌(dmNPC)诱导化疗联合局部区域放疗的疗效和安全性。

方法

146 例 dmNPC 患者按 1:1 比例随机分为 4-6 个周期 GP(GP 组)或 TPF 诱导化疗(TPF 组)联合局部区域放疗(LRRT)。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和治疗相关不良事件(AE)。

结果

截至数据截止日期(2024 年 5 月 31 日),中位随访时间为 60.0 个月(IQR 40.3-68.1)。GP 组和 TPF 组的中位 OS(35.4 与 34.8 个月,p=0.2609)和 PFS(15.8 与 14.3 个月,p=0.2318)无显著差异。GP 组和 TPF 组的 ORR(65.8%与 71.2%,p=0.476)和 DCR(79.5%与 82.2%,p=0.674)也无显著差异。此外,GP 组的 5 年 OS 为 40.1%(95%CI,29.6%-54.2%),而 TPF 组为 27.2%(95%CI,17.9%-41.3%)(HR=0.79,95%CI,0.53-1.20)。然而,TPF 组的 3-4 级 AE 发生率较高,如中性粒细胞减少症、白细胞减少症、恶心和腹泻。

结论

该研究表明,4-6 个周期的 TPF 诱导化疗联合 LRRT 可达到与 GP 方案相当的治疗效果,且安全性可控。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验