Supplementary methods for filling material removal: A systematic review and meta-analysis of micro-CT imaging studies.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of supplementary methods, including Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI), ultrasonic inserts, XP-Endo Finisher, XP-Endo Finisher R, Easy Clean, sonic activation, and the Er:YAG laser (SWEEPS), in removing residual filling material (RFM) during endodontic retreatment.

METHOD

Five electronic databases and gray literature were searched on May 5, 2024. Two independent reviewers selected laboratory studies that assessed the efficacy of supplementary methods for RFM removal using micro-CT imaging. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental Studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the pooled mean values of initial and final RFM volumes after the use of different supplementary methods.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included in the qualitative analysis, and seventeen were included in the meta-analyses. Only seven studies (21.9 %) fulfilled all criteria of the methodological quality checklist. No supplementary method has been able to eradicate RFM from root canals. However, the quantitative analysis demonstrated that using PUI, ultrasonic inserts, XP-Endo Finisher, and XP-Endo Finisher R instruments effectively reduced RFM (p < 0.05). In contrast, Easy Clean, sonic activation, and Er:YAG laser (SWEEPS) did not demonstrate a significant reduction (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Supplementary methods were unable to completely remove RFM from the canal walls during endodontic retreatment. However, the use of PUI, ultrasonic inserts, XP-Endo Finisher, and XP-Endo Finisher R instruments has been shown to significantly reduce the amount of RFM.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Clinicians are encouraged to incorporate supplementary methods for filling material removal during endodontic retreatment to enhance the cleaning of root canal walls.