Hammam Nevin, Elsaman Ahmed, Abualfadl Esam, Senara Soha, Gamal Nada M, Abd-Elsamea Mona H, Moshrif Abdelhfeez, Hammam Osman, Gheita Tamer A, Tharwat Samar
Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag, Egypt.
Clin Rheumatol. 2025 Jan;44(1):207-215. doi: 10.1007/s10067-024-07210-0. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of systemic lupus erythematosus Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) in Egyptian patients with SLE using a national rheumatology database.
The Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR) database comprised of 1,162 patients with SLE and 4,327 with miscellaneous rheumatological diseases who were recruited from the Rheumatology Departments across the country. The diagnosis of SLE was established by expert rheumatologists. Variables of the SLERPI were extracted and recorded as present or absent for each patient. The absolute value for the SLERPI score was calculated for each patient, and the diagnosis of SLE was accounted for if the score was greater than 7 points.
Of 1,162 SLE patients evaluated, 1,031 (88.7%) patients were diagnosed with SLE according to the SLERPI, with an average score of 13.1 (3.8). Differences in the 14 SLERPI variables were significant between the SLE-SLERPI groups, except for the presence of leukopenia and positive ANA. As a score reduction item, the SLE-SLERPI > 7 group had lower interstitial lung diseases. Patients diagnosed with SLE according to SLERPI had significantly higher disease activity (p < 0.001), and this group more commonly received corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil. Compared to other miscellaneous rheumatological groups, all 14 SLERPI items are indeed more common in the SLE group. In terms of the overall performance of SLERPI in the diagnosis of SLE, the accuracy of SLERPI was 91.9% (95% CI 90.9%-92.9%), with a specificity of 96.95% and sensitivity of 86.9%. SLERPI showed that accuracy went up to 93.3% (95%CI 92.4%-94.2%), with a specificity of 94.9% and a sensitivity of 91.6% when patients with connective tissue diseases were taken out of the study.
Using a large cohort of SLE, the SLERPI revealed excellent diagnostic efficacy and specificity. The use of SLERPI in clinical practice may contribute to improved patient diagnosis and prognosis. Key Points • SLERPI's performance has high diagnostic efficiency in Egyptian SLE patients. • SLERPI score can efficiently distinguish patients with SLE from other CTDs. • Within the SLERPI score, interstitial lung disease is the lowest predictor of SLE.
本研究旨在利用一个全国性的风湿病数据库评估系统性红斑狼疮风险概率指数(SLERPI)在埃及系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者中的表现。
埃及风湿病学会(ECR)数据库包含1162例SLE患者和4327例其他风湿性疾病患者,这些患者来自全国各地的风湿病科。SLE的诊断由风湿病专家确定。提取SLERPI的变量,并记录每位患者是否存在该变量。计算每位患者的SLERPI评分绝对值,若评分大于7分,则诊断为SLE。
在1162例接受评估的SLE患者中,根据SLERPI诊断出1031例(88.7%)SLE患者,平均评分为13.1(3.8)。除白细胞减少症和抗核抗体阳性外,SLE - SLERPI组之间14个SLERPI变量存在显著差异。作为一个评分降低项,SLE - SLERPI > 7组的间质性肺疾病较少。根据SLERPI诊断为SLE的患者疾病活动度显著更高(p < 0.001),且该组更常接受皮质类固醇和霉酚酸酯治疗。与其他风湿性疾病组相比,所有14个SLERPI项目在SLE组中确实更为常见。就SLERPI在SLE诊断中的总体表现而言,SLERPI的准确率为91.9%(95%CI 90.9% - 92.9%),特异性为96.95%,敏感性为86.9%。当将结缔组织病患者排除在研究之外时,SLERPI显示准确率提高到93.3%(95%CI 92.4% - 94.2%),特异性为94.9%,敏感性为91.6%。
通过大量SLE队列研究,SLERPI显示出优异的诊断效能和特异性。在临床实践中使用SLERPI可能有助于改善患者的诊断和预后。要点 • SLERPI在埃及SLE患者中的表现具有较高的诊断效率。 • SLERPI评分可有效区分SLE患者与其他结缔组织病患者。 • 在SLERPI评分中,间质性肺疾病是SLE最低的预测指标。