• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多少才算足够?评估急诊医学实习生达到胜任水平所需的快速超声检查次数。

How many is enough? Measuring the number of FAST exams needed by emergency medicine trainees to reach competence.

作者信息

Bakhribah Ahmad, Leumas Jordan, Helland Gregg, Guttman Joshua, Arfaj Yara, Alharbi Rawan, Bakhsh Abdullah

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Department of Emergency medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Department of Emergency medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, USA.

出版信息

Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 4;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00742-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00742-x
PMID:39491007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11533274/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients with blunt abdominal trauma, the Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) exam is the initial imaging modality employed to diagnose and risk stratify. A positive FAST exam in this patient population denotes intraperitoneal hemorrhage. In a hemodynamically unstable patient, it necessitates rapid surgical intervention. Ultrasound is highly dependent on the operator's ability to obtain quality images for interpretation. Failure to obtain adequate images prevents accurate interpretation and reduce its diagnostic accuracy. Previous studies evaluating whether the FAST exam can be improved solely by experience had conflicting results. None of those studies used an objective method to evaluate the FAST exam's quality. Our study aimed to objectively determine the number of FAST exams required by an emergency medicine (EM) resident to reach sufficient quality for independent scanning.

METHODS

59 first-year EM residents from a single site were included in this study. All FAST exams that were saved in the Qpath archival system by the 59 EM residents, whether the exam was performed for educational or clinical purposes, were reviewed, and scored using a Task-Specific Checklist (TSC) score. This score is an objective way to assess the proficiency and quality of the FAST scan. The TSC was based on whether the imaging of 24 specific anatomic landmarks, split into four anatomic regions, was completed successfully or not. The AEMUS (Advanced EM Ultrasonography) faculty provided feedback to trainees wither electronically via Qpath or at the bedside. According to the quality of ultrasound imaging and competence (QUICK Score), if the average TSC score for the first 10 exams was 18 or higher, the resident was considered an expert. However, if the resident failed to achieve that score, we skipped the first exam performed by the resident and the average score for the second through eleventh exams was then calculated. If the resident did not achieve the desired result, the first and second exams were skipped and the average score for the remaining 10 exams was determined. This sequence was repeated until the resident achieved an average score of 18 or higher on their TSC score.

RESULTS

In total, 663 FAST scans performed by EM residents were scored. The average number of FAST exams needed for independent scanning is 11.23 (95% CI, 10.6-11.85). 66.1% of enrolled residents achieved an average score of 18 or higher in their first 10 FAST exams, and 33.8% of residents required more than 10 scans. The average scores for the right upper quadrant (RUQ), left upper quadrant (LUQ), pelvic, and subxiphoid views were 5 (95% CI, 4.88-5.1), 4.7 (95% CI, 4.59-4.8), 5.1 (95% CI, 4.96-5.24), and 3.7 (95% CI 3.6-3.8) respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that when constructive feedback on each FAST exam was given, the average first-year emergency medicine resident achieves competency in performing FAST exams independently after completing 10-12 (average of 11.23) FAST exams. Further research is required to validate the findings.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b898/11533274/a917e48d2ed1/12245_2024_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b898/11533274/c80b4f4d57de/12245_2024_742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b898/11533274/a917e48d2ed1/12245_2024_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b898/11533274/c80b4f4d57de/12245_2024_742_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b898/11533274/a917e48d2ed1/12245_2024_742_Fig2_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

对于钝性腹部创伤患者,创伤重点超声评估(FAST)检查是用于诊断和风险分层的初始成像方式。在该患者群体中,FAST检查结果呈阳性表示腹腔内出血。对于血流动力学不稳定的患者,这需要迅速进行手术干预。超声高度依赖操作者获取高质量图像以进行解读的能力。未能获取足够的图像会妨碍准确解读并降低其诊断准确性。以往评估FAST检查是否仅通过经验就能得到改善的研究结果相互矛盾。这些研究均未使用客观方法来评估FAST检查的质量。我们的研究旨在客观确定急诊医学(EM)住院医师达到足以独立扫描的质量所需进行的FAST检查次数。

方法

本研究纳入了来自单一机构的59名一年级EM住院医师。对这59名EM住院医师保存在Qpath存档系统中的所有FAST检查进行回顾,无论该检查是用于教学目的还是临床目的,并使用特定任务清单(TSC)评分进行评分。该评分是评估FAST扫描熟练程度和质量的一种客观方式。TSC基于24个特定解剖标志(分为四个解剖区域)的成像是否成功完成。高级急诊医学超声(AEMUS)教员通过Qpath以电子方式或在床边为学员提供反馈。根据超声成像质量和能力(QUICK评分),如果前10次检查的平均TSC评分为18分或更高,则该住院医师被视为专家。然而,如果住院医师未达到该分数,我们跳过该住院医师进行的第一次检查,然后计算第二次至第十一次检查的平均分数。如果住院医师未达到预期结果,则跳过第一次和第二次检查,确定其余10次检查的平均分数。重复此顺序,直到住院医师的TSC评分达到18分或更高。

结果

EM住院医师共进行了663次FAST扫描并进行了评分。独立扫描所需的FAST检查平均次数为11.23次(95%置信区间,10.6 - 11.85)。66.1%的入选住院医师在前10次FAST检查中平均得分达到18分或更高,33.8%的住院医师需要进行超过10次扫描。右上腹(RUQ)、左上腹(LUQ)、盆腔和剑突下视图的平均分数分别为5分(95%置信区间,4.88 - 5.1)、4.7分(95%置信区间,4.59 - 4.8)、5.1分(95%置信区间,4.96 - 5.24)和3.7分(95%置信区间3.6 - 3.8)。

结论

本研究表明,当对每次FAST检查给予建设性反馈时,一年级急诊医学住院医师在完成10 - 12次(平均11.23次)FAST检查后能够独立胜任FAST检查。需要进一步研究来验证这些发现。

相似文献

1
How many is enough? Measuring the number of FAST exams needed by emergency medicine trainees to reach competence.多少才算足够?评估急诊医学实习生达到胜任水平所需的快速超声检查次数。
Int J Emerg Med. 2024 Nov 4;17(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12245-024-00742-x.
2
An Experiential Learning Model Facilitates Learning of Bedside Ultrasound by Preclinical Medical Students.一种体验式学习模式促进临床前医学学生对床旁超声的学习。
J Surg Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;73(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.10.007.
3
Point of Care Ultrasounds Obtained by Novice Physician Assistant Residents (POCUS ON PAR).由新手医师助理住院医师(POCUS ON PAR)获得的即时超声检查。
Mil Med. 2024 Aug 30;189(9-10):e2242-e2247. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usae219.
4
Caudal Edge of the Liver in the Right Upper Quadrant (RUQ) View Is the Most Sensitive Area for Free Fluid on the FAST Exam.右上腹(RUQ)视图中肝脏的尾缘是快速超声检查(FAST)中检测游离液体最敏感的区域。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):270-280. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.11.30435. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
5
Direct Observation Assessment of Ultrasound Competency Using a Mobile Standardized Direct Observation Tool Application With Comparison to Asynchronous Quality Assurance Evaluation.使用移动标准化直接观察工具应用程序对超声技能进行直接观察评估,并与异步质量保证评估进行比较。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Feb 19;3(2):172-178. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10324. eCollection 2019 Apr.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of secondary ultrasound exam in blunt abdominal trauma.腹部钝性创伤中二次超声检查的诊断准确性
Iran J Radiol. 2014 Aug;11(3):e21010. doi: 10.5812/iranjradiol.21010. Epub 2014 Jul 20.
7
Little Patients, Big Tasks - A Pediatric Emergency Medicine Escape Room.小患者,大任务——一场儿科急诊医学密室逃脱游戏
J Educ Teach Emerg Med. 2023 Oct 31;8(4):SG1-SG19. doi: 10.21980/J89W70. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
Competency Assessment in Senior Emergency Medicine Residents for Core Ultrasound Skills.对高级急诊医学住院医师核心超声技能的能力评估
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):923-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.28587. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Variability in Ultrasound Education among Emergency Medicine Residencies.急诊医学住院医师培训中超声教育的变异性。
West J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;11(4):314-8.
10
How fast is the focused assessment with sonography for trauma examination learning curve?创伤超声重点评估检查的学习曲线有多快?
Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Feb;20(1):32-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01039.x. Epub 2007 Dec 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Independent learning of the sonographic FAST exam technique using a tablet-based training module.基于平板电脑的培训模块进行超声 FAST 检查技术的自主学习。
Am J Disaster Med. 2021;16(2):95-104. doi: 10.5055/ajdm.2021.0392.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of Extended Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma Performed by Paramedic Students: A Simulation-Based Pilot Study.护理专业学生进行的超声创伤扩展重点评估的诊断准确性:一项基于模拟的初步研究。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 21;13:249-256. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S311376. eCollection 2021.
3
Working Towards Competence: A Novel Application of Borderline Regression to a Task-Specific Checklist for Technical Skills in Novices.
努力达到能力水平:使用边缘回归方法对新手技术技能特定检查表的一项新应用。
J Surg Educ. 2021 Nov-Dec;78(6):2052-2062. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jun 3.
4
Point-of-care ultrasound stewardship.床旁超声管理
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Oct 11;1(6):1326-1331. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12279. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Diagnostic performance of the extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) patients in a tertiary care hospital of Nepal.尼泊尔一家三级护理医院中创伤患者的超声扩展聚焦评估(EFAST)的诊断性能。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Jul 28;5(1):e000438. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000438. eCollection 2020.
6
Development and validation a task-specific checklist for a microsurgical varicocelectomy simulation model.开发并验证一种用于显微精索静脉结扎术模拟模型的特定任务清单。
Int Braz J Urol. 2020 Sep-Oct;46(5):796-802. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0571.
7
Diagnostic Accuracy of Lung Ultrasound Performed by Novice Versus Advanced Sonographers for Pneumonia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.新手与高级超声医师对儿童肺炎进行肺部超声检查的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;26(9):1074-1088. doi: 10.1111/acem.13818. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
8
Validation of the quality of ultrasound imaging and competence (QUICk) score as an objective assessment tool for the FAST examination.超声成像质量与能力(QUICk)评分作为FAST检查客观评估工具的验证
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 May;78(5):1008-13. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000639.
9
Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography.急诊超声检查中的误差来源。
Crit Ultrasound J. 2013 Jul 15;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. doi: 10.1186/2036-7902-5-S1-S1.
10
Management of bleeding following major trauma: an updated European guideline.严重创伤后出血的处理:欧洲最新指南。
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):R52. doi: 10.1186/cc8943. Epub 2010 Apr 6.