Suppr超能文献

从基于问题的学习课程系列中去除小组SOAP病历书写对实习轮转期间文档记录表现的影响。

Impact of removing group SOAP note writing from a problem-based learning course series on documentation performance during experiential rotations.

作者信息

Battise Dawn, Harris John Brock, Haltom Wesley, Waghel Rashi, Wilson Jenn

机构信息

Wingate University School of Pharmacy, PO Box 159, Wingate, NC 28174, United States of America.

出版信息

Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2023 Oct 26. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2023.10.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Documentation is a key component of pharmacy education, and SOAP (subjective, objective, assessment, plan) notes are a common framework. Learners must receive feedback, but the amount needed to achieve desired outcomes on experiential rotations is unknown. This study assessed the impact of discontinuing group-written SOAP notes in a four-course problem-based learning (PBL) series on note scores in experiential rotations.

EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING

Three cohorts across five graduating classes were compared; group-written SOAP notes in four, two, and no PBL semesters. Note writing scores on inpatient medicine and ambulatory care introductory and advanced pharmacy practice experiences (IPPEs and APPEs) were compared using logistic analysis. The odds ratio (OR) of writing a "high performance" note was determined compared to the reference of zero semesters of PBL note writing.

FINDINGS

Additional PBL SOAP note writing did not impact inpatient medicine IPPE scores; however, four semesters of note writing significantly lowered internal medicine APPE note writing scores (OR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.31-0.84, P = .008). In contrast, two and four semesters of SOAP note writing improved ambulatory care IPPE note writing (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.17-4.65, P = .02 and OR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.47-4.16, P < .001, respectively) but there was no difference in ambulatory care APPE note scores.

SUMMARY

Removing opportunities for group-written SOAP notes in a PBL course series minimally impacted students' performance on APPEs. Institutions may consider if current SOAP note feedback is effective in preparing learners for APPEs.

摘要

背景与目的

记录是药学教育的关键组成部分,而SOAP(主观、客观、评估、计划)记录是一种常见的框架。学习者必须获得反馈,但在实践轮转中达到预期结果所需的反馈量尚不清楚。本研究评估了在四门基于问题的学习(PBL)课程系列中停止小组撰写SOAP记录对实践轮转中记录分数的影响。

教育活动与环境

比较了五个毕业班的三个队列;分别在四个、两个和无PBL学期进行小组撰写SOAP记录。使用逻辑分析比较了内科住院和门诊护理入门及高级药学实践经验(IPPE和APPE)中的记录撰写分数。与零学期PBL记录撰写的参考值相比,确定了撰写“高性能”记录的优势比(OR)。

研究结果

额外的PBL SOAP记录撰写并未影响内科住院IPPE分数;然而,四个学期的记录撰写显著降低了内科APPE记录撰写分数(OR = 0.51,95% CI = 0.31 - 0.84,P = 0.008)。相比之下,两个和四个学期的SOAP记录撰写提高了门诊护理IPPE记录撰写水平(OR分别为2.33,95% CI = 1.17 - 4.65,P = 0.02和OR = 2.48,95% CI = 1.47 - 4.16,P < 0.001),但门诊护理APPE记录分数没有差异。

总结

在PBL课程系列中取消小组撰写SOAP记录的机会对学生在APPE中的表现影响最小。院校可考虑当前的SOAP记录反馈在使学习者为APPE做准备方面是否有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验