Broman Ashton, Rawlinson Jennifer E, Bass Luke, Boscan Pedro, Rao Sangeeta
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Rood and Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, KY, USA.
J Vet Dent. 2025 Jan;42(1):55-65. doi: 10.1177/08987564241295586. Epub 2024 Nov 3.
The use of proper sedative and regional anesthetic protocols is essential when performing equine dental surgical procedures under standing sedation. The efficacy of the rostral inferior alveolar nerve block via the mental foramen has not been previously studied. Aims of this study included determining the efficacy of the block, investigating whether any region (labial mucosa, alveolar mucosa, or teeth) was more reliably anesthetized, and if differences in efficacy existed between bilateral and unilateral blocks. In this blinded trial, 10 horses each were randomly assigned to receive a left unilateral block, right unilateral block or bilateral blocks and 5 horses were bilateral controls. For unilateral groups, the contralateral side of the horse acted as its own unilateral control. Mechanical nociceptive stimulus methods were used to determine response to stimulus at time points pre-sedation, post-sedation, and post-injection at 10, 30, 60, and 90 min. Results were evaluated in 4 groups: unilateral blocks, unilateral controls, bilateral blocks and bilateral controls. Overall, all groups were significantly less likely to respond to stimulus at time points post-sedation, T10, and T30, whereas only blocked sites were less likely to respond at T60 and T90 compared to pre-sedation. There was no significant difference in response to stimuli of blocked sites between the 3 regions at all time points. Overall, at T60 and T90, blocks produced regional anesthesia in 73% and 55% of sites, respectively. This study demonstrated the equine mental foramen regional nerve block has varied efficacy, producing partial or incomplete regional anesthesia in some cases.
在站立镇静状态下进行马牙科手术时,采用适当的镇静和局部麻醉方案至关重要。此前尚未对通过颏孔进行的下颌前牙槽神经阻滞的效果进行研究。本研究的目的包括确定该阻滞的效果,调查是否有任何区域(唇黏膜、牙槽黏膜或牙齿)能更可靠地被麻醉,以及双侧阻滞和单侧阻滞在效果上是否存在差异。在这项双盲试验中,10匹马被随机分配接受左侧单侧阻滞、右侧单侧阻滞或双侧阻滞,5匹马作为双侧对照。对于单侧组,马的对侧作为其自身的单侧对照。采用机械性伤害性刺激方法,在镇静前、镇静后以及注射后10、30、60和90分钟的时间点确定对刺激的反应。在4组中评估结果:单侧阻滞组、单侧对照组、双侧阻滞组和双侧对照组。总体而言,所有组在镇静后、T10和T30时间点对刺激有反应的可能性显著降低,而与镇静前相比,仅在T60和T90时,阻滞部位对刺激有反应的可能性降低。在所有时间点,3个区域的阻滞部位对刺激的反应没有显著差异。总体而言,在T60和T90时,阻滞分别在73%和55%的部位产生了区域麻醉。本研究表明,马颏孔区域神经阻滞效果各异,在某些情况下会产生部分或不完全的区域麻醉。