Yonchak T, Reader A, Beck M, Meyers W J
The Ohio State University, Columbus 43218-2357, USA.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Aug;92(2):132-5. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.115720.
The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with unilateral and bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks to determine whether cross innervation occurs in anterior teeth.
Through use of a repeated-measures design, 38 subjects randomly received unilateral or bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks at two separate appointments. Each inferior alveolar nerve block used 3.6 mL of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. Mandibular anterior teeth were blindly pulp-tested at 4-minute cycles for 60 minutes' postinjection. No response from the subject to the maximum output (80 reading) of the pulp tester was used as the criterion for pulpal anesthesia. Anesthesia was considered successful when 2 consecutive 80 readings were obtained.
One hundred percent of the subjects had lip numbness with each of the inferior alveolar nerve block techniques. Anesthetic success rates of the unilateral inferior alveolar nerve block were 39% for the central incisor, 50% for the lateral incisor, and 68% for the canine. For the bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks, success rates were 66% for the central incisor, 74% for the lateral incisor, and 76% for the canine. The bilateral inferior alveolar nerve block success rates were significantly (P <.05) higher for the central and lateral incisors when compared with the success rates of the unilateral inferior alveolar nerve block.
Cross innervation does seem to occur in mandibular central and lateral incisors. However, the success rates in these teeth with bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks were below 75%. The failure of the inferior alveolar nerve blocks to anesthetize the anterior teeth was the overriding reason for failure. Clinically, bilateral inferior alveolar nerve blocks to provide profound pulpal anesthesia in mandibular anterior teeth are not recommended on the basis of the results of this study.
这项前瞻性随机研究的目的是测量单侧和双侧下牙槽神经阻滞获得的麻醉程度,以确定前牙是否存在交叉神经支配。
采用重复测量设计,38名受试者在两次单独的就诊中随机接受单侧或双侧下牙槽神经阻滞。每次下牙槽神经阻滞使用3.6毫升含1:100,000肾上腺素的2%利多卡因。注射后每隔4分钟对下颌前牙进行盲法牙髓测试,共测试60分钟。受试者对牙髓测试仪的最大输出值(80读数)无反应被用作牙髓麻醉的标准。当连续获得2次80读数时,麻醉被认为成功。
采用每种下牙槽神经阻滞技术时,100%的受试者出现唇部麻木。单侧下牙槽神经阻滞的麻醉成功率,中切牙为39%,侧切牙为50%,尖牙为68%。双侧下牙槽神经阻滞时,中切牙成功率为66%,侧切牙为74%,尖牙为76%。与单侧下牙槽神经阻滞的成功率相比,双侧下牙槽神经阻滞在中切牙和侧切牙的成功率显著更高(P<.05)。
下颌中切牙和侧切牙似乎确实存在交叉神经支配。然而,这些牙齿采用双侧下牙槽神经阻滞的成功率低于75%。下牙槽神经阻滞未能麻醉前牙是失败的首要原因。根据本研究结果,临床上不建议采用双侧下牙槽神经阻滞来为下颌前牙提供深度牙髓麻醉。