Aitchison Alexandra H, Khoury Philip H, Stoeber William, Anastasio Albert T, Baumann Anthony N, Cullen Mark M, Monahan Peter, Walley Kempland C, Eward William
Department of Orthopedics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA.
Department of Orthopedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 2;16(10):e70714. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70714. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Introduction In the complex landscape of healthcare economics, the financial relationship between physicians and industry remains a topic of significant interest and reflection. While the dynamics of industry relationships in certain orthopedic subspecialties have been well documented, the intricacies of industry payments within musculoskeletal (MSK) oncology programs have yet to be thoroughly explored. In this study, we aim to examine the relationship between academic and industry productivity at the fellowship level. Additionally, we seek to identify the associations between the flow of industry supplemental income to orthopedic oncologists and the specific residency and fellowship training programs they are affiliated with. Methodology A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted using data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Scopus, and other relevant databases in 2023. This study included 19 fellowship programs across the United States, encompassing a total of 68 faculty physicians. Various variables were examined, including H-index, lifetime supplemental income, geographical location, residency affiliation, and association with top-ranked hospitals. Results A statistically significant correlation was found between academic and industry productivity at the individual faculty level (p = 0.003), but not at the fellowship level (p = 0.198). The top 10% of earners accounted for approximately 70% of the total lifetime supplemental income among all fellowship faculty. Additionally, there was no statistically significant association between lifetime supplemental income or academic productivity per fellowship and geographical region, nor with the ranking of affiliated residency programs or hospitals. Conclusions Industry productivity among individual faculty in MSK oncology fellowship programs in the United States is significantly associated with academic productivity; however, this association was not observed at the fellowship level. Furthermore, no statistically significant relationship was found regarding the region or the ranking of the affiliated residency programs or hospitals.
引言 在医疗保健经济学的复杂格局中,医生与行业之间的财务关系仍是一个备受关注和反思的话题。虽然某些骨科亚专业中行业关系的动态已有详尽记录,但肌肉骨骼(MSK)肿瘤学项目中行业支付的复杂性尚未得到充分探索。在本研究中,我们旨在考察 fellowship 层面学术与行业生产力之间的关系。此外,我们试图确定骨科肿瘤学家获得的行业补充收入流与其所属的特定住院医师培训和 fellowship 培训项目之间的关联。
方法 2023 年,我们使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心、Scopus 以及其他相关数据库的数据进行了全面的回顾性分析。本研究纳入了美国各地的 19 个 fellowship 项目,共有 68 名教职医生。我们考察了各种变量,包括 H 指数、终身补充收入、地理位置、住院医师所属关系以及与顶级医院的关联。
结果 在个体教职医生层面,学术与行业生产力之间存在统计学显著相关性(p = 0.003),但在 fellowship 层面不存在这种相关性(p = 0.198)。收入最高的 10% 的人占所有 fellowship 教职员工终身补充收入总额的约 70%。此外,每个 fellowship 的终身补充收入或学术生产力与地理区域之间,以及与所属住院医师培训项目或医院的排名之间,均未发现统计学显著关联。
结论 美国 MSK 肿瘤学 fellowship 项目中个体教职员工的行业生产力与学术生产力显著相关;然而,在 fellowship 层面未观察到这种关联。此外,在所属住院医师培训项目或医院的区域或排名方面,未发现统计学显著关系。