Lüthy Christina
Lund University, Sweden.
Organ Stud. 2024 Nov;45(11):1555-1577. doi: 10.1177/01708406241273828. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
Voluntary organising frequently relies on affective intensities to direct organisational efforts. However, it is not well understood how these intensities are cultivated across time and different contexts to engage and coordinate heterogeneous actors. By applying a practice approach to affect, this paper proposes the concept of affective practices to theorise how affect is mobilised in materially driven (inter)actions to shape actions and relationalities around organisational goals. The analysis of ethnographic data from a long-term public art project reveals that four affective practices - enticing, envisioning, attending and asserting - are pivotal to sustaining the distributed process of voluntary organising. The sense of fascination, enthusiasm, care and discomfort that these affective practices mobilise instigates participation, support, acceptance and compliance from diverse partners, volunteers and the local public. Contributing to the affective turn in practice theory, the paper theorises how affective processes are cultivated as situative accomplishments in an ongoing and translocal organisational process, highlighting the important role played by the vibrant presence of matter in affective practices. Additionally, the study expands our understanding of how an interplay of affective intensities engages and aligns diverse individuals and groups in voluntary organising by fostering coalitional moments in the organisational process.
志愿组织常常依赖情感强度来引导组织工作。然而,目前人们对这些强度如何随着时间推移以及在不同背景下得以培养,从而促使不同性质的行动者参与并协调行动,还了解得不够透彻。通过运用一种关于情感的实践方法,本文提出了情感实践的概念,以从理论上说明情感是如何在物质驱动的(互动)行动中被调动起来,从而围绕组织目标塑造行动及关系的。对一个长期公共艺术项目的民族志数据的分析表明,四种情感实践——吸引、设想、关注和主张——对于维持志愿组织的分布式过程至关重要。这些情感实践所调动起来的着迷、热情、关怀和不适之感,激发了不同合作伙伴、志愿者及当地公众的参与、支持、接纳和顺从。本文为实践理论中的情感转向做出了贡献,从理论上说明了情感过程是如何在一个持续且跨地域的组织过程中作为情境性成就而得以培养的,强调了物质的活跃存在在情感实践中所发挥的重要作用。此外,该研究拓展了我们对于情感强度的相互作用如何通过在组织过程中促成联合时刻,从而促使不同个体和群体参与并协调志愿组织工作的理解。