• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

传统起搏器植入后新发心力衰竭的危险因素及发生率:一项全国性研究。

Risk factors and incidence of new-onset heart failure with conventional pacemaker implant: A nationwide study.

作者信息

Farouq Maiwand, Rorsman Cecilia, Marinko Sofia, Mörtsell David, Chaudhry Uzma, Wang Lingwei, Platonov Pyotr, Borgquist Rasmus

机构信息

Cardiology Section, Department of Clinical sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Arrhythmia Section, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 23;5(9):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.012. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.012
PMID:39493904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11524952/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that the risk of new-onset heart failure (HF) is higher postimplantation for patients receiving right ventricular pacing.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate incidence, risk factors, and implications for long-term prognosis of new-onset HF in patients after pacemaker implantation.

METHODS

Patients without pre-existing HF who received a pacemaker in Sweden during the period of 2005 to 2020 were identified via the nationwide Pacemaker Registry. Data were crossmatched with the population registry and national disease registries. The primary outcome was new-onset HF within 5 years, and a risk score for this was developed and validated.

RESULTS

In all, 65,579 patients met the inclusion criteria (10,351 single-chamber ventricular and 55,228 dual-chamber pacemakers). A total of 13,792 (21.0%) patients were diagnosed with HF within 5 years postimplantation. Of these, 6244 (45.3%) were hospitalized for HF. Patients with new-onset HF were more likely to die within 5 years (41.2% vs 19.7%, < .0001). Risk factors for new-onset HF included increasing age, male sex, hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, chronic lung and kidney disease, ischemic heart disease, and atrioventricular block. In a combined score using these variables, patients in the highest risk-score quartile had a hazard ratio of 5.36 (95% CI 4.91-5.86, < .001) and an absolute risk of 32% for developing HF.

CONCLUSION

Pacemaker therapy is associated with >20% risk of new-onset HF within 5 years, and we identified 9 risk factors associated with the diagnosis of new-onset HF. The proposed score based on these variables can be used to identify patients at high risk for new-onset HF.

摘要

背景

研究表明,接受右心室起搏的患者植入后新发心力衰竭(HF)的风险更高。

目的

本研究旨在调查起搏器植入术后患者新发HF的发生率、危险因素及其对长期预后的影响。

方法

通过全国起搏器登记处识别2005年至2020年期间在瑞典接受起搏器植入且既往无HF的患者。数据与人口登记处和国家疾病登记处进行交叉匹配。主要结局是5年内新发HF,并为此制定和验证了风险评分。

结果

共有65579例患者符合纳入标准(10351例单腔心室起搏器和55228例双腔起搏器)。共有13792例(21.0%)患者在植入后5年内被诊断为HF。其中,6244例(45.3%)因HF住院。新发HF患者在5年内死亡的可能性更高(41.2%对19.7%,P<0.0001)。新发HF的危险因素包括年龄增加、男性、高血压、糖尿病、心房颤动、慢性肺和肾脏疾病、缺血性心脏病和房室传导阻滞。在使用这些变量的综合评分中,处于最高风险评分四分位数的患者发生HF的风险比为5.36(95%CI 4.91-5.86,P<0.001),绝对风险为32%。

结论

起搏器治疗与5年内新发HF风险>20%相关,我们确定了9个与新发HF诊断相关的危险因素。基于这些变量提出的评分可用于识别新发HF的高危患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/556d583e6eb5/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/65527a8a9b03/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/abff41074e66/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/9e153613cc23/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/556d583e6eb5/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/65527a8a9b03/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/abff41074e66/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/9e153613cc23/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cc9/11524952/556d583e6eb5/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors and incidence of new-onset heart failure with conventional pacemaker implant: A nationwide study.传统起搏器植入后新发心力衰竭的危险因素及发生率:一项全国性研究。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2024 Jul 23;5(9):623-630. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.07.012. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Biventricular pacing (cardiac resynchronization therapy): an evidence-based analysis.双心室起搏(心脏再同步治疗):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005;5(13):1-60. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
3
Age-Stratified Clinical Outcome in Patients with Known Heart Failure Who Receive Pacemaker, Resynchronization Therapy, or Defibrillator Implants.植入起搏器、心脏再同步治疗装置或除颤器的已知心力衰竭患者的年龄分层临床结局。
Cardiology. 2024;149(5):474-483. doi: 10.1159/000538529. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
4
Incidence and Time Course for Developing Heart Failure With High-Burden Right Ventricular Pacing.高负荷右心室起搏致心力衰竭的发生率及病程
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017 Jun;10(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003564.
5
New-onset heart failure after permanent right ventricular apical pacing in patients with acquired high-grade atrioventricular block and normal left ventricular function.获得性高度房室传导阻滞且左心室功能正常的患者在永久性右心室心尖部起搏后新发心力衰竭
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;19(2):136-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2007.01014.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
6
Post-pacemaker implant QRS duration and heart failure admission in patients with sick sinus syndrome and complete atrioventricular block.起搏器植入术后 QRS 时限与病态窦房结综合征并完全性房室传导阻滞患者心力衰竭入院的关系。
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Aug;6(4):686-693. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12445. Epub 2019 May 20.
7
Dual-chamber pacemakers for treating symptomatic bradycardia due to sick sinus syndrome without atrioventricular block: a systematic review and economic evaluation.用于治疗无房室传导阻滞的病态窦房结综合征所致症状性心动过缓的双腔起搏器:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(65):1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta19650.
8
Dual-chamber vs. single-chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study.双腔起搏器与单腔起搏器治疗窦性心律伴房室传导阻滞患者的比较:一项全国性队列研究。
Europace. 2024 Aug 30;26(9). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae238.
9
Incidence of heart failure after pacemaker implantation: a nationwide Danish Registry-based follow-up study.起搏器植入后心力衰竭的发生率:一项基于全国丹麦注册的随访研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3641-3648. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz584.
10
[Left atrial and ventricular epicardial dual chamber pacing through a left lateral thoracotomy to treat pediatric complete atrioventricular block].[经左外侧开胸行左心房与心室心外膜双腔起搏治疗小儿完全性房室传导阻滞]
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;51(8):578-83.

引用本文的文献

1
How harmful is right ventricular pacing? The question revived by the BioPace trial.右心室起搏的危害有多大?BioPace试验再次提出了这个问题。
Europace. 2025 Mar 5;27(3). doi: 10.1093/europace/euaf005.

本文引用的文献

1
EHRA clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation: executive summary. Endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), Canadian Heart Rhythm Society (CHRS) and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).EHRA 临床共识声明:关于心脏传导系统起搏植入的专家共识——执行摘要。本共识由亚太心脏节律学会(APHRS)、加拿大心脏节律学会(CHRS)和拉丁美洲心脏节律学会(LAHRS)共同认可。
Europace. 2023 Apr 15;25(4):1237-1248. doi: 10.1093/europace/euad044.
2
Avoiding unnecessary ventricular pacing is associated with reduced incidence of heart failure hospitalizations and persistent atrial fibrillation in pacemaker patients.避免不必要的心室起搏与减少心力衰竭住院和起搏器患者持续性心房颤动的发生率相关。
Europace. 2023 May 19;25(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euad065.
3
Clinical outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing compared to His bundle pacing.左束支区域起搏与希氏束起搏的临床转归比较。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;33(6):1234-1243. doi: 10.1111/jce.15516. Epub 2022 May 10.
4
His-Purkinje conduction system pacing: A systematic review and network meta-analysis in bradycardia and conduction disorders.希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏:心动过缓和传导障碍的系统评价与网状荟萃分析
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Dec;32(12):3245-3258. doi: 10.1111/jce.15269. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
5
Left bundle branch pacing: A comprehensive review.左束支起搏:全面综述。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2462-2473. doi: 10.1111/jce.14681. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
6
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Heart Failure: A Breathless Conspiracy.慢性阻塞性肺疾病与心力衰竭:一场惊心动魄的共谋。
Heart Fail Clin. 2020 Jan;16(1):33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2019.08.003.
7
Incidence of heart failure after pacemaker implantation: a nationwide Danish Registry-based follow-up study.起搏器植入后心力衰竭的发生率:一项基于全国丹麦注册的随访研究。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Nov 21;40(44):3641-3648. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz584.
8
Permanent pacemaker use among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: Findings from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE) National Registry.心力衰竭伴射血分数保留患者中永久性心脏起搏器的使用:来自急性失代偿性心力衰竭国家注册(ADHERE)国家注册的研究结果。
Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:123-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.020. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
9
Clinical Outcomes of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Right Ventricular Pacing.希氏束起搏与右心室起搏的临床转归比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2319-2330. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.048. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
10
Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals.心力衰竭发病率的时间趋势和模式:一项基于 400 万人的人群研究。
Lancet. 2018 Feb 10;391(10120):572-580. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32520-5. Epub 2017 Nov 21.