Aranda A A, Kelty J S, Manukian S, Pardo E, Jabbari K, Schmidt R J, Dabritz H A, London J K, Van Winkle L S, Deeb-Sossa N
UC Davis Knights Landing One Health Center.
UC Davis Human Ecology Department.
Community Sci. 2024 Sep;3(3). doi: 10.1029/2024csj000088. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
Environmental justice research driven by academics and policymakers often overlooks the valuable insights and leadership of the communities most impacted by environmental hazards. When institution-led research approaches are employed, inadequate community ownership and limited institutional accountability hinder the effectiveness of environmental public health interventions. In contrast, a community-owned and -managed approach to environmental justice research can guide community members in developing evidence-based interventions. This paper outlines a community-led environmental health assessment survey (sample= 100) and resulting community actions over six years (2017 to 2023) in a Northern California farmworker community with a perceived high prevalence of cancer and exposure to environmental hazards in households, neighborhoods, and job sites. Local resident experts in Knights Landing, CA, documented community risk factors and exposures in collaboration with interdisciplinary undergraduate and graduate student-researchers. The survey instrument focused on environmental hazards identified by local resident experts including vehicular and agricultural pollution, occupational pesticide contact, and sun exposure. Survey findings highlighted the need for targeted interventions to reduce environmental health risks, such as academic outreach programs, county investments in public services, and community-led mutual aid initiatives. Despite academic reservations about our non-random sampling method and data collection by local resident experts, our project sparked substantial actions and investments with minimal personnel and financial resources. Local leaders working with student-researchers developed more effective environmental public health interventions through a community-owned and -managed approach that went beyond the efforts of local regulatory and research institutions.
由学者和政策制定者推动的环境正义研究往往忽视了受环境危害影响最大的社区的宝贵见解和领导力。当采用机构主导的研究方法时,社区所有权不足和机构问责有限会阻碍环境公共卫生干预措施的有效性。相比之下,一种由社区自主拥有和管理的环境正义研究方法可以指导社区成员制定基于证据的干预措施。本文概述了一项由社区主导的环境卫生评估调查(样本量 = 100)以及在加利福尼亚州北部一个农场工人社区六年间(2017年至2023年)由此产生的社区行动,该社区被认为癌症患病率较高,且家庭、邻里和工作场所存在环境危害暴露情况。加利福尼亚州奈茨兰丁的当地居民专家与跨学科的本科生和研究生研究人员合作,记录了社区风险因素和暴露情况。调查工具聚焦于当地居民专家确定的环境危害,包括车辆和农业污染、职业性农药接触以及阳光照射。调查结果凸显了采取针对性干预措施以降低环境健康风险的必要性,例如学术推广项目、县对公共服务的投资以及社区主导的互助倡议。尽管学术界对我们的非随机抽样方法以及由当地居民专家进行数据收集存在保留意见,但我们的项目以最少的人员和财政资源引发了大量行动和投资。与学生研究人员合作的当地领导人通过一种社区自主拥有和管理的方法,制定了比当地监管和研究机构的努力更有效的环境公共卫生干预措施。