• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3D打印手腕矫形器与低温热塑性手腕矫形器的生产时间及实用性

Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.

作者信息

von Haller Marianne, Couchman Louise, Honigmann Philipp

机构信息

Hand Therapy, Kantonsspital Baselland, Bruderholz, Switzerland.

College of Health Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK.

出版信息

Hand Ther. 2024 Dec;29(4):188-194. doi: 10.1177/17589983241287069. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

DOI:10.1177/17589983241287069
PMID:39494223
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528581/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a new manufacturing technique for orthoses, showing comparable stability and wearing comfort to traditional orthoses. However, the lengthy designing and printing process is assumed to take more time than the common practice of manufacturing low-temperature thermoplastic orthoses (LTTOs). The aim of this prospective cross-sectional study was to compare the production time of 3D-printed orthoses (3DPO) to LTTOs.

METHODS

The active and passive time needed to manufacture the orthoses was measured in a clinical setting. 17 orthoses (8 3DPOs and 9 LTTOs) were included in the data analysis.

RESULTS

The mean total production time of a 3DPO (12:14:50h total time; 0:44:35h active production time) was significantly longer than in LTTOs (0:14:14h; < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The longer production time might be a hurdle regarding the implementation of 3DPOs in hand therapy. Although 3D-printing might become more cost- and time-efficient due to future developments in technology and growing experience, some practical advantages of LTTOs prevail, such as the fast and efficient provision of orthoses and the adaptability of the material if subsequent changes are needed. A combination of both manufacturing techniques may be a feasible solution to provide patient-centred orthosis provision in future hand therapy practice.

摘要

引言

近年来,三维(3D)打印已成为一种用于矫形器的新型制造技术,其稳定性和穿着舒适度与传统矫形器相当。然而,人们认为漫长的设计和打印过程比制造低温热塑性矫形器(LTTO)的常规做法耗时更长。这项前瞻性横断面研究的目的是比较3D打印矫形器(3DPO)与LTTO的生产时间。

方法

在临床环境中测量制造矫形器所需的主动和被动时间。数据分析纳入了17个矫形器(8个3DPO和9个LTTO)。

结果

3DPO的平均总生产时间(总时间12:14:50小时;主动生产时间0:44:35小时)明显长于LTTO(0:14:14小时;<0.001)。

讨论

较长的生产时间可能是3DPO在手部治疗中应用的一个障碍。尽管由于技术的未来发展和经验的积累,3D打印可能会变得更具成本效益和时间效率,但LTTO的一些实际优势仍然存在,例如矫形器的快速高效提供以及在需要后续更改时材料的适应性。两种制造技术的结合可能是未来手部治疗实践中提供以患者为中心的矫形器的可行解决方案。

相似文献

1
Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.3D打印手腕矫形器与低温热塑性手腕矫形器的生产时间及实用性
Hand Ther. 2024 Dec;29(4):188-194. doi: 10.1177/17589983241287069. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
2
Utilization of 3D printed orthoses for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity: A systematic review.3D 打印矫形器在上肢肌肉骨骼疾病中的应用:系统评价。
J Hand Ther. 2023 Jan-Mar;36(1):166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
3
3D printing technology applied to orthosis manufacturing: narrative review.应用于矫形器制造的3D打印技术:叙述性综述
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;9(6):4262-4270. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1185. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Preliminary effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses in chronic hand conditions: study protocol for a non-randomised interventional feasibility study.3D 打印矫形器治疗慢性手部疾病的初步疗效:一项非随机干预可行性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 6;13(4):e069424. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069424.
5
Novel 3D-printed foot orthoses with variable hardness: A comfort comparison to traditional orthoses.具有可变硬度的新型3D打印足部矫形器:与传统矫形器的舒适度比较。
Med Eng Phys. 2023 May;115:103978. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.103978. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
6
Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review.3D 打印踝足矫形器的设计、制造和交付的可行性:系统评价。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2019 Feb 7;12:11. doi: 10.1186/s13047-019-0321-6. eCollection 2019.
7
Automated 3D-printed finger orthosis versus manual orthosis preparation by occupational therapy students: Preparation time, product weight, and user satisfaction.自动化 3D 打印手指矫形器与职业治疗学生手工制作矫形器的比较:准备时间、产品重量和用户满意度。
J Hand Ther. 2020 Apr-Jun;33(2):174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2020.03.022. Epub 2020 May 15.
8
Production Time and User Satisfaction of 3-Dimensional Printed Orthoses For Chronic Hand Conditions Compared With Conventional Orthoses: A Prospective Case Series.与传统矫形器相比,三维打印慢性手部疾病矫形器的生产时间和用户满意度:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Feb 12;4:1000048. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000048. eCollection 2021.
9
Flatfoot arch correction with generic 3D-printed orthoses at different body weight percentages.平底足足弓矫正与不同体重百分比的通用 3D 打印矫形器。
Foot (Edinb). 2024 Jun;59:102093. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2024.102093. Epub 2024 Mar 18.
10
Immediate comfort perception of 3D-printed foot orthoses in individuals with unilateral heel pain.3D 打印足矫形器对单侧足跟痛患者即时舒适度的感知。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2022 Feb 1;46(1):31-36. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000068.

引用本文的文献

1
3D-Printed Orthoses vs Conventional Immobilization Methods for Pediatric Distal Radius Fractures.用于小儿桡骨远端骨折的3D打印矫形器与传统固定方法的比较
J Orthop Physician Assist. 2025 Jul-Sep;13(3). doi: 10.2106/jbjs.jopa.25.00006.
2
Economic evaluation of the manufacturing of 3D-printed wrist orthoses vs low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.3D打印手腕矫形器与低温热塑性手腕矫形器制造的经济评估。
3D Print Med. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41205-025-00287-6.

本文引用的文献

1
In-house 3D-printed custom splints for non-operative treatment of distal radial fractures: a randomized controlled trial.内固定 3D 打印定制夹板治疗桡骨远端骨折的非手术治疗:一项随机对照试验。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2024 Mar;49(3):350-358. doi: 10.1177/17531934231187554. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
Personalized 3D-printed forearm braces as an alternative for a traditional plaster cast or splint; A systematic review.个性化 3D 打印前臂支具替代传统石膏或夹板:系统评价。
Injury. 2022 Nov;53 Suppl 3:S47-S52. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.07.020. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Use of a 3D-printed splint for the treatment of distal radius fractures: A randomized controlled trial.使用 3D 打印夹板治疗桡骨远端骨折:一项随机对照试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Sep;108(5):103326. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103326. Epub 2022 May 17.
4
3D-Printed Patient-Specific Casts for the Distal Radius in Children: Outcome and Pre-Market Survey.儿童桡骨远端的3D打印定制石膏:结果与上市前调查
Materials (Basel). 2022 Apr 13;15(8):2863. doi: 10.3390/ma15082863.
5
3D-Printed Hand Splints versus Thermoplastic Splints: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Feasibility Trial.3D打印手部夹板与热塑性夹板:一项随机对照试验的可行性预试验
Int J Bioprint. 2021 Dec 2;8(1):474. doi: 10.18063/ijb.v8i1.474. eCollection 2022.
6
Utilization of 3D printed orthoses for musculoskeletal conditions of the upper extremity: A systematic review.3D 打印矫形器在上肢肌肉骨骼疾病中的应用:系统评价。
J Hand Ther. 2023 Jan-Mar;36(1):166-178. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 21.
7
Effectiveness of 3D-printed orthoses for traumatic and chronic hand conditions: A scoping review.3D 打印矫形器治疗创伤性和慢性手部疾病的有效性:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 18;16(11):e0260271. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260271. eCollection 2021.
8
Production Time and User Satisfaction of 3-Dimensional Printed Orthoses For Chronic Hand Conditions Compared With Conventional Orthoses: A Prospective Case Series.与传统矫形器相比,三维打印慢性手部疾病矫形器的生产时间和用户满意度:一项前瞻性病例系列研究。
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Feb 12;4:1000048. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000048. eCollection 2021.
9
In-hospital professional production of patient-specific 3D-printed devices for hand and wrist rehabilitation.院内专业制作用于手部和腕部康复的患者特异性 3D 打印设备。
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2021 Apr;40(2):126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.10.016. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
3D printing technology applied to orthosis manufacturing: narrative review.应用于矫形器制造的3D打印技术:叙述性综述
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Nov;9(6):4262-4270. doi: 10.21037/apm-20-1185. Epub 2020 Sep 24.