Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo College of Medicine Rochester MN.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology Mayo Clinic Rochester MN.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036812. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036812. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
A subset of individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) have a high burden of cardiovascular risk factors and cerebral small-vessel disease, implicating vascular disease in the development of depression. Cross-sectional studies demonstrate a link between endothelial dysfunction and MDD, but the prospective association between peripheral endothelial dysfunction (PED) and an incident diagnosis of MDD is unknown.
Patients undergoing a baseline assessment of cardiovascular risk were evaluated for PED using reactive hyperemia-peripheral arterial tonometry (≤1.8 consistent with PED). Patient medical records were reviewed to identify those who underwent a formal clinical evaluation of MDD the index PED evaluation. The frequency of PED was compared in those with and without MDD. Logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the association between baseline PED and incident MDD. Between January 2006 and December 2020, 1614 patients underwent testing for PED. Four hundred eighty-four (30.1%) patients underwent a formal evaluation for MDD after (0-15 years) the index procedure (mean±SD age, 52.8±13.8 years; 65.2% women). Of these, 157 (32.4%) had PED and 108 (31.0%) were diagnosed with MDD. Individuals with MDD had a higher frequency of PED (40.2% versus 30.2%; =0.034) compared with those without MDD. In multivariable analyses, PED was significantly associated with MDD (odds ratio, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.4-3.8]; <0.001).
PED is significantly associated with incident MDD. Thus, PED may be a useful marker to identify individuals at increased risk of depression who may benefit from more frequent and earlier management strategies.
部分患有重度抑郁症(MDD)的个体存在心血管风险因素和脑小血管疾病的高负担,这表明血管疾病与抑郁症的发生有关。横断面研究表明内皮功能障碍与 MDD 之间存在联系,但外周内皮功能障碍(PED)与 MDD 发病之间的前瞻性关联尚不清楚。
对接受心血管风险基线评估的患者使用反应性充血-外周动脉张力测定法(PED,≤1.8)评估 PED。查阅患者病历,以确定那些接受 MDD 正式临床评估的患者-索引 PED 评估。比较 MDD 患者和非 MDD 患者的 PED 频率。进行逻辑回归分析,以评估基线 PED 与新发 MDD 之间的关联。在 2006 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间,有 1614 名患者接受了 PED 检测。在索引程序后(0-15 年),有 484 名(30.1%)患者接受了 MDD 的正式评估(平均年龄±标准差,52.8±13.8 岁;65.2%为女性)。其中,157 名(32.4%)患者有 PED,108 名(31.0%)被诊断为 MDD。患有 MDD 的个体 PED 发生率高于无 MDD 个体(40.2%比 30.2%;=0.034)。多变量分析显示,PED 与 MDD 显著相关(优势比,2.3[95%置信区间,1.4-3.8];<0.001)。
PED 与新发 MDD 显著相关。因此,PED 可能是一种有用的标志物,可用于识别处于抑郁风险增加的个体,这些个体可能受益于更频繁和更早的管理策略。