School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Chronobiol Int. 2024 Nov;41(11):1492-1502. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2024.2419851. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
This study investigated whether sleep-specific (e.g. chronotype) and traditional (e.g. resilience) protective factors were associated with reduced shift work disorder (SWD) risk and explored their role as moderators in the relationship between SWD risk and health. Shift workers ( = 126) participated in a cross-sectional study evaluating SWD risk (i.e. low vs. high; SWD-screening Questionnaire), mental health (Patient Health Questionnaire-9; Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-7), physical health (Subjective Health Complaints Inventory), sleep (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; Insomnia Severity Index; Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and protective factors (Resilience Scale; Social Provisions Scale; Survey of Perceived Organizational Support; Short Impulsive Behavior Scale; Circadian Type Inventory; reduced-Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire). Logistic regressions revealed lower sleep languidity was associated with reduced odds (OR = 0.88 [0.79,0.96]) for having high SWD risk. Multiple regression analyses showed in shift workers with high social support or morningness, having high SWD risk was not associated with increased depression symptoms, or insomnia severity and poor sleep quality, respectively. Finally, in those with high or medium levels of perceived organizational support, high SWD risk was not associated with increased gastrointestinal and allergy complaints. Longitudinal research with larger samples is needed to confirm the moderating role of protective factors in the relationship between SWD risk and health.
本研究旨在探讨睡眠特异性(如睡眠时型)和传统(如韧性)保护因素是否与降低轮班工作障碍(SWD)风险有关,并探讨它们在 SWD 风险与健康之间关系中的调节作用。共有 126 名轮班工人参与了一项横断面研究,评估 SWD 风险(即低风险与高风险;SWD 筛查问卷)、心理健康(患者健康问卷-9;广泛性焦虑症问卷-7)、身体健康(主观健康抱怨量表)、睡眠(匹兹堡睡眠质量指数;失眠严重程度指数;Epworth 嗜睡量表)和保护因素(韧性量表;社会支持量表;感知组织支持调查;冲动行为量表;昼夜类型量表;简化的早晨-傍晚问卷)。逻辑回归显示,睡眠惰性较低与降低高 SWD 风险的几率(OR=0.88 [0.79,0.96])相关。多元回归分析表明,在社会支持度高或早晨型的轮班工人中,高 SWD 风险与抑郁症状、失眠严重程度和睡眠质量差无关。最后,在感知组织支持度高或中等的人群中,高 SWD 风险与胃肠道和过敏投诉增加无关。需要进行具有更大样本量的纵向研究来确认保护因素在 SWD 风险与健康之间关系中的调节作用。