• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在卫生技术评估中实施沙盒方法:效益和建议。

Implementing a sandbox approach in health technology assessment: benefits and recommendations.

机构信息

Science Evidence and Analytics Directorate, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, UK.

Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000412.

DOI:10.1017/S0266462324000412
PMID:39494820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11569896/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The sandbox approach, developed in the financial technologies sector, creates an environment to collaboratively develop and test innovative new products, methods and regulatory approaches, separated from business as usual. It has been used in health care to encourage innovation in response to emerging challenges, but, until recently, has not been used in health technology assessment (HTA). This article summarizes our learnings from using the sandbox approach to address three challenges facing HTA organizations and to identify implications for the use of this approach in HTA.

METHODS

We identified three challenging contemporary HTA-related topics to explore in a sandbox environment, away from the pressures and interests of "live" assessments. We convened a pool of 120 stakeholders and experts to participate in various sandbox activities and ultimately co-develop solutions to help HTA organizations respond to the identified challenges.

RESULTS

Important general learnings about the potential benefits and implementation of a sandbox approach in HTA were identified. Consequently, we developed recommendations to guide its use, including how to implement an HTA sandbox in an effective way and the types of challenges for which it may be best suited.

CONCLUSIONS

For many HTA organizations, it is difficult to carefully consider emerging challenges and innovate their processes due to risks associated with decision errors and resource limitations. The sandbox approach could reduce these barriers. The potential benefits of addressing HTA challenges in a collaborative "safe space" are considerable.

摘要

目的

沙盒方法是在金融技术领域开发的,它创建了一个协作开发和测试创新新产品、方法和监管方法的环境,与常规业务分开。它已在医疗保健领域用于鼓励创新以应对新出现的挑战,但直到最近,尚未在卫生技术评估(HTA)中使用。本文总结了我们在使用沙盒方法应对 HTA 组织面临的三个挑战方面的经验教训,并确定了该方法在 HTA 中的应用的影响。

方法

我们确定了三个具有挑战性的当代 HTA 相关主题,以在沙盒环境中进行探索,远离“实时”评估的压力和利益。我们召集了 120 名利益相关者和专家参与各种沙盒活动,并最终共同制定解决方案,以帮助 HTA 组织应对确定的挑战。

结果

确定了在 HTA 中使用沙盒方法的潜在好处和实施方面的重要一般经验。因此,我们提出了指导其使用的建议,包括如何有效地实施 HTA 沙盒以及它最适合解决的挑战类型。

结论

对于许多 HTA 组织来说,由于与决策错误和资源限制相关的风险,很难仔细考虑新出现的挑战并创新其流程。沙盒方法可以减少这些障碍。在协作“安全空间”中解决 HTA 挑战的潜在好处是相当大的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/da0b3afd11cf/S0266462324000412_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/213ee6bb99c2/S0266462324000412_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/50fa9bc14ad7/S0266462324000412_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/da0b3afd11cf/S0266462324000412_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/213ee6bb99c2/S0266462324000412_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/50fa9bc14ad7/S0266462324000412_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a97/11569896/da0b3afd11cf/S0266462324000412_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Implementing a sandbox approach in health technology assessment: benefits and recommendations.在卫生技术评估中实施沙盒方法:效益和建议。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e44. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000412.
2
The Sandbox Approach and its Potential for Use in Health Technology Assessment: A Literature Review.沙盒方法及其在健康技术评估中的潜在应用:文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Nov;19(6):857-869. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00665-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
3
A health technology assessment of COVID-19 vaccination for Nigerian decision-makers: Identifying stakeholders and pathways to support evidence uptake.尼日利亚决策者的 COVID-19 疫苗接种卫生技术评估:确定利益相关者和支持证据采用的途径。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jun 26;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01158-y.
4
Linking Reimbursement to Patient Benefits for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products and Other High-Cost Innovations: Policy Recommendations for Outcomes-Based Agreements in Europe.将报销与先进治疗药物产品和其他高成本创新药物的患者获益相挂钩:欧洲基于结果的协议的政策建议。
Value Health. 2024 Nov;27(11):1497-1506. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Health technology assessment and priority setting for universal health coverage: a qualitative study of stakeholders' capacity, needs, policy areas of demand and perspectives in Nigeria.卫生技术评估和全民健康覆盖的优先事项制定:尼日利亚利益攸关方能力、需求、政策领域需求和观点的定性研究。
Global Health. 2020 Jul 8;16(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12992-020-00583-2.
6
Health technology assessment of tests for SARS-CoV-2 and treatments for COVID-19: A proposed approach and best-practice recommendations.SARS-CoV-2 检测和 COVID-19 治疗的卫生技术评估:拟议方法和最佳实践建议。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 24;39(1):e24. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000223.
7
A situational and stakeholder analysis of health technology assessment in Zimbabwe.津巴布韦卫生技术评估的情境和利益相关者分析。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Apr 29;40(1):e27. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000266.
8
Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.医疗设备的卫生技术评估:有何不同?三个欧洲项目概述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(4-5):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
9
STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AT NATIONAL LEVEL: A STUDY FROM IRAN.国家层面利益相关者参与卫生技术评估:来自伊朗的一项研究
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2016 Jan;32(3):181-9. doi: 10.1017/S0266462316000167. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
10
Introducing a Regulatory Sandbox Into the Indonesian Health System Using e-Malaria as a Use Case: Participatory Action Study.引入监管沙盒至印度尼西亚卫生系统:以电子疟疾为例:参与式行动研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 5;25:e47706. doi: 10.2196/47706.

本文引用的文献

1
Response to uncertainty management in regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making on drugs: guidance of the HTAi-DIA Working Group - author's reply.药物监管与卫生技术评估决策中不确定性管理的应对措施:HTAi-DIA工作组指南——作者回复
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Dec 18;40(1):e1. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323002817.
2
Uncertainty management in regulatory and health technology assessment decision-making on drugs: guidance of the HTAi-DIA Working Group.药物监管和卫生技术评估决策中的不确定性管理:HTAi-DIA 工作组的指南。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jun 16;39(1):e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000375.
3
Health technology assessment of tests for SARS-CoV-2 and treatments for COVID-19: A proposed approach and best-practice recommendations.
SARS-CoV-2 检测和 COVID-19 治疗的卫生技术评估:拟议方法和最佳实践建议。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 24;39(1):e24. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000223.
4
Decision Curve Analysis for Personalized Treatment Choice between Multiple Options.决策曲线分析用于多种选择的个性化治疗方案选择。
Med Decis Making. 2023 Apr;43(3):337-349. doi: 10.1177/0272989X221143058. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Reported Challenges in Health Technology Assessment of Complex Health Technologies.复杂医疗技术的卫生技术评估报告中的挑战
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1356. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
6
Understanding innovation of health technology assessment methods: the IHTAM framework.理解卫生技术评估方法的创新:IHTAM 框架。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2022 Jan 31;38(1):e16. doi: 10.1017/S0266462322000010.
7
The Sandbox Approach and its Potential for Use in Health Technology Assessment: A Literature Review.沙盒方法及其在健康技术评估中的潜在应用:文献综述。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Nov;19(6):857-869. doi: 10.1007/s40258-021-00665-1. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
8
Medical Mobile App Classification Using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies: Interrater Reliability Study.使用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所数字健康技术证据标准框架对医疗移动应用程序进行分类:评分者间信度研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 5;22(6):e17457. doi: 10.2196/17457.