Suppr超能文献

希腊药品卫生技术评估:5 年(2018-2023 年)时间轴和效率回顾。

Health technology assessment of medicinal products in Greece: a 5-year (2018-2023) review of timelines and productivity.

机构信息

Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement Committee, Greek Ministry of Health, Athens, Greece.

School of Economics and Political Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000485.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the health technology assessment (HTA) process in Greece from its establishment in 2018 until 2023 in terms of timeliness and productivity.

METHODS

Data were collected from the HTA Committee's database and other publicly available sources. The overall study timeframe was divided into three periods: (i) July 2018-January 2020, (ii) January 2020-July 2021, and (iii) July 2021-February 2023.

RESULTS

During the study period, a total of 1,157 applications for medicinal products (MPs) (including 219 new active substances (NAS) and orphans) were submitted to the HTA Committee. The number of HTA recommendations increased from 60 (first period) to 641 (third period), while the backlog of MPs pending HTA and price negotiations decreased from 89 and 106 (January 2020) to 8 and 44 (February 2023), respectively. The median time intervals for all application types decreased significantly over time. In February 2023, the median time for clinical data assessment of NAS (excluding orphans) almost halved from 207 days in the first period to 114 days; median times for NAS and orphans from regulatory approval to HTA application were 420 and 457 days, and from HTA application to reimbursement 228 and 417 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of the HTA process in Greece improved significantly over time, with increased MP appraisals, backlog reduction, and decreased timelines. Delays in reimbursement of NAS were mainly caused by the long gap between regulatory approval and HTA application. Overall, HTA review times in Greece are now on par with that of well-established European HTA systems.

摘要

目的

评估 2018 年至 2023 年期间希腊的卫生技术评估(HTA)流程在及时性和效率方面的情况。

方法

数据来自 HTA 委员会的数据库和其他公开来源。整个研究时间框架分为三个时期:(i)2018 年 7 月至 2020 年 1 月,(ii)2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月,和(iii)2021 年 7 月至 2023 年 2 月。

结果

在研究期间,共有 1157 份药品(包括 219 种新活性物质(NAS)和孤儿药)申请提交给 HTA 委员会。HTA 建议的数量从 60 项(第一期)增加到 641 项(第三期),而待 HTA 和价格谈判的药品积压数量从 89 项和 106 项(2020 年 1 月)减少到 8 项和 44 项(2023 年 2 月)。所有申请类型的中位数时间间隔都随着时间的推移而显著缩短。2023 年 2 月,NAS(不包括孤儿药)临床数据评估的中位数时间从第一期的 207 天几乎减半至 114 天;从监管批准到 HTA 申请的 NAS 和孤儿药的中位数时间分别为 420 天和 457 天,从 HTA 申请到报销的中位数时间分别为 228 天和 417 天。

结论

希腊 HTA 流程的绩效随着时间的推移有了显著的提高,评估的药品数量增加,积压减少,时间线缩短。NAS 报销的延迟主要是由于监管批准和 HTA 申请之间的时间间隔较长所致。总体而言,希腊的 HTA 审查时间现在与成熟的欧洲 HTA 系统相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24db/11563181/8af409c358da/S0266462324000485_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Health technology assessment of medicinal products in Greece: a 5-year (2018-2023) review of timelines and productivity.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2024 Nov 4;40(1):e40. doi: 10.1017/S0266462324000485.
2
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT FOR INTRODUCING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN GREECE.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(3):396-401. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000629. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
Early dialogue with health technology assessment bodies: a European perspective.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Dec;30(6):571-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000713.
4
New Drug Reimbursement and Pricing Policy in Taiwan.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 May;15:127-132. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
5
Health technology assessment of medicines in Greece: pharmaceutical industry executives' views.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014 Apr;30(2):226-32. doi: 10.1017/S0266462314000130. Epub 2014 May 7.
7
Variation in Health Technology Assessment and Reimbursement Processes in Europe.
Value Health. 2017 Jan;20(1):67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.08.725. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
9
To HTA or Not to HTA: Identifying the Factors Influencing the Rapid Review Outcome in Ireland.
Value Health. 2019 Apr;22(4):385-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.10.011. Epub 2019 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

2
Accessibility of cancer drugs in Switzerland: Time from approval to pricing decision between 2009 and 2018.
Health Policy. 2020 Mar;124(3):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
3
Does external reference pricing deliver what it promises? Evidence on its impact at national level.
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Feb;21(1):129-151. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01116-4. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
4
Health Technology Assessment of Drugs in Ireland: An Analysis of Timelines.
Pharmacoecon Open. 2020 Jun;4(2):287-296. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-00177-8.
5
Defining capacity building in the context of HTA: a proposal by the HTAi Scientific Development and Capacity Building Committee.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35(5):362-366. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000631. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
6
Comparing access to orphan medicinal products in Europe.
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019 May 3;14(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s13023-019-1078-5.
8
Pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA): Timelines Analysis and Policy Implications.
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Feb 18;9:1578. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01578. eCollection 2018.
9
Drug Policy in Greece.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2018 Sep;16:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT FOR INTRODUCING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN GREECE.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(3):396-401. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000629. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验