Wang Ting, McAuslane Neil, Liberti Lawrence, Gardarsdottir Helga, Goettsch Wim, Leufkens Hubert
Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, United Kingdom.
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Dec 3;11:594549. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.594549. eCollection 2020.
Health technology assessment (HTA) has increased in importance in supporting payer decision making by assessing the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of new medicines. Thus, pharmaceutical companies need to address the HTA requirements early during development to improve reimbursement outcomes. Currently, there is a lack of research to assess the impact of HTA on development and jurisdictional outcome from companies' perspectives. This study aimed to assess companies' HTA strategy and characterise HTA practice in seven jurisdictions. A multi-year, annual study collected information for individual products, focusing on development activities regarding inclusion of HTA requirements and selection of global comparators. The generation of local contextual information, submission strategies and predictability of HTA outcomes was examined jurisdictionally in Australia, Canada, England, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. The study questionnaire was built into a secure online data collection platform and data were provided annually by participating companies. Data for 169 compounds were provided by nine international companies between 2014 and 2018. HTA requirements were implemented in evidence generation plan for 63% of products during development. Global comparators were accepted by HTA bodies for more than half of studied products; Spain showed the highest acceptance rate (85%). Companies took advantages of parallel process in Australia and Canada to shorten product rollout time. Australia demonstrated general consistency in HTA review time, and England had the longest variation (interquartile range, 216 days). Requirements for additional information after submission occurred at all HTA bodies. Germany and Italy showed the highest percentage of products being reimbursed as per regulatory label (80 and 68%, respectively). Canada was the most predictable jurisdiction, with the highest proportion of review outcome (90%) that met companies' expectations. Companies are addressing HTA requirements during development for many products; however, they are challenged by varying requirements and practices and product success ultimately depends on how HTA organisations and payers assess added value in the context of the national healthcare systems. This ongoing study created a baseline to help capture fact-based changes for company HTA strategies and HTA body practices.
卫生技术评估(HTA)在通过评估新药的相对有效性和成本效益来支持支付方决策方面的重要性日益增加。因此,制药公司需要在研发早期就满足HTA要求,以提高报销结果。目前,缺乏从公司角度评估HTA对研发和各辖区结果影响的研究。本研究旨在评估公司的HTA策略,并描述七个辖区的HTA实践情况。一项为期多年的年度研究收集了单个产品的信息,重点关注纳入HTA要求和选择全球对照品的研发活动。在澳大利亚、加拿大、英国、法国、德国、意大利和西班牙,对当地背景信息的生成、提交策略和HTA结果的可预测性进行了辖区层面的考察。研究问卷被纳入一个安全的在线数据收集平台,参与公司每年提供数据。2014年至2018年期间,9家国际公司提供了169种化合物的数据。63%的产品在研发期间的证据生成计划中纳入了HTA要求。超过一半的研究产品的全球对照品被HTA机构接受;西班牙的接受率最高(85%)。公司利用澳大利亚和加拿大的并行流程来缩短产品推出时间。澳大利亚在HTA审查时间上表现出总体一致性,而英国的差异最大(四分位距为216天)。提交后所有HTA机构都有要求提供额外信息的情况。德国和意大利按监管标签报销的产品比例最高(分别为80%和68%)。加拿大是最具可预测性的辖区,审查结果符合公司预期的比例最高(90%)。许多产品在研发过程中公司都在满足HTA要求;然而,它们面临着不同要求和实践的挑战,产品的成功最终取决于HTA组织和支付方如何在国家医疗保健系统背景下评估附加值。这项正在进行的研究创建了一个基线,以帮助捕捉公司HTA策略和HTA机构实践中基于事实的变化。