Krafft Paul R, Tafel Ian, Khanna Anjali, Han Patrick, Khanna Rohit
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida at Halifax Health, Daytona Beach , Florida , USA.
Florida State University College of Medicine, Daytona Beach , Florida , USA.
Neurosurgery. 2025 Jun 1;96(6):1353-1363. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003244. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
Dynamic craniotomy as opposed to a fixed plate craniotomy provides cranial decompression with a controlled outward bone flap movement to accommodate postoperative cerebral swelling and/or hemorrhage. The objective of this study was to evaluate if fixation of the bone flap following a trauma craniotomy with dynamic plates provides any advantage over fixed plates.
A review of our clinical series of 25 consecutive adult patients undergoing dynamic craniotomy with the Khanna NuCrani reversibly expandable bone flap fixation plates for the treatment of traumatic brain injury associated with mass lesions including subdural, epidural, and cerebral hematomas was conducted.
Postoperative cerebral swelling was encountered in 21 of 25 patients (84%), which was compensated for with outward bone flap movement in all these patients and associated decreased midline shift. Severe brain swelling with outward bone flap movement of 8 mm or more was noted in 40% of the patients. All patients had a normal intracranial pressure after surgery. None of the patients required any reoperations for hematoma evacuation, rescue decompressive craniectomies, cranioplasty, or complications related to wound healing. The bone flap retracted after the resolution of the brain swelling, and none of the patients reported cosmetic symptoms related to bone flap or wound healing. Overall, 84% (21 of 25) of the patients achieved a good outcome.
Craniotomy bone flap fixation with dynamic plates is an alternative to craniotomy with fixed plates. The main advantage of dynamic craniotomy over a craniotomy with fixed plates is that it allows for immediate intracranial volume expansion with reversible outward bone flap migration in patients who may develop postoperative worsening brain swelling and/or hemorrhage, with decreased need for repeat surgeries and associated complications.
与固定骨瓣开颅术不同,动态开颅术可通过可控的向外骨瓣移动实现颅骨减压,以适应术后脑肿胀和/或出血。本研究的目的是评估创伤性开颅术后使用动态固定板固定骨瓣是否比固定板具有任何优势。
回顾了我们连续25例成年患者的临床系列,这些患者接受了使用Khanna NuCrani可逆性可扩展骨瓣固定板的动态开颅术,以治疗与包括硬膜下、硬膜外和脑血肿在内的占位性病变相关的创伤性脑损伤。
25例患者中有21例(84%)术后出现脑肿胀,所有这些患者的脑肿胀均通过向外骨瓣移动得到代偿,且中线移位减少。40%的患者出现严重脑肿胀,骨瓣向外移动8毫米或更多。所有患者术后颅内压均正常。没有患者因血肿清除、抢救性减压颅骨切除术、颅骨成形术或与伤口愈合相关的并发症而需要再次手术。脑肿胀消退后骨瓣回缩,没有患者报告与骨瓣或伤口愈合相关的美容症状。总体而言,84%(21/25)的患者取得了良好的结果。
使用动态固定板进行开颅术骨瓣固定是固定板开颅术的一种替代方法。动态开颅术相对于固定板开颅术的主要优势在于,对于可能出现术后脑肿胀和/或出血恶化的患者,它允许通过可逆的向外骨瓣迁移立即进行颅内容积扩张,减少了重复手术及相关并发症的需求。