Gould Sara, Crawford Anna E, Picken Lauren, Serrano Devon, Gabriel Fernanda, McGwin Gerald, Chandran Avinash, Schrum Kevin
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama.
Birmingham Veterans Administration Health Care Service (VAHCS), Birmingham, Alabama.
Clin J Sport Med. 2024 Nov 5. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000001297.
To characterize helmet use, head injury risk, and to examine rider-related factors that influence these variables.
Cross-sectional study.
The University of Alabama at Birmingham Equestrian Sports Medicine Collaborative.
In total, 357 equestrians competing at the collegiate level participated in this study.
χ2 tests were used to evaluate potential associations between a rider's experience level, riding style, and use of helmet designed with MIPS with number of falls, past head injuries, and helmet use frequency.
Data regarding helmet use and equestrian-related injuries were collected. χ2 analysis was used to determine potential associations.
More than 50% of athletes reported falling off a horse during the course of 1 year. Head injuries occurred with high frequency. Concussion was the most frequently reported type. More than 50% of athletes with self-reported concussion denied receiving medical treatment. The risk of head injury was similar across helmet brands, and between helmets with Multi-Directional Impact Protection System (MIPS) and those without. Riders with the most experience were less likely to report sustaining a head injury than those with less experience. Contrary to current safety guidelines, 78% of equestrians said that they would not replace their helmet after every fall.
Collegiate equestrians have a high risk of fall-related traumatic head injury. Despite this risk, they report helmet use practices that are not in line with current recommendations regarding helmet replacement. This suggests that many of the athletes are using protective equipment that does not adequately protect against head injury. Neither helmet brand nor liner type was associated with lower rate of head injury.
描述头盔使用情况、头部受伤风险,并研究影响这些变量的骑手相关因素。
横断面研究。
阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校马术运动医学合作项目。
共有357名参加大学水平比赛的骑手参与了本研究。
采用χ²检验评估骑手的经验水平、骑行风格以及使用带有MIPS设计的头盔与跌倒次数、既往头部受伤情况和头盔使用频率之间的潜在关联。
收集有关头盔使用和与马术相关损伤的数据。采用χ²分析确定潜在关联。
超过50%的运动员报告在1年中从马背上跌落过。头部受伤频繁发生。脑震荡是最常报告的类型。超过50%自我报告有脑震荡的运动员否认接受过治疗。不同头盔品牌之间以及带有多向冲击保护系统(MIPS)的头盔和没有该系统的头盔之间,头部受伤风险相似。经验最丰富的骑手比经验较少的骑手报告头部受伤的可能性更小。与当前安全指南相反,78%的骑手表示他们不会每次跌倒后都更换头盔。
大学水平的骑手有与跌倒相关的创伤性头部受伤的高风险。尽管存在这种风险,但他们报告的头盔使用做法不符合当前关于头盔更换的建议。这表明许多运动员使用的防护装备不能充分预防头部受伤。头盔品牌和衬里类型均与较低的头部受伤率无关。