Talpey Scott W, Drake Micah, Haintz Liam, Belanger Anthony, O'Grady Mathew W, Young Warren B, Mundy Peter D, James Lachlan, Gabbett Tim J, Gardner Elizabeth C
Sport, Performance, and Nutrition Research Group, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University, Ballarat, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Feb 1;39(2):200-209. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004969. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
Talpey, SW, Drake, M, Haintz, L, Belanger, A, O'Grady, MW, Young, WB, Mundy, PD, James L, Gabbett, TJ, Gardner, EC. The reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I American football players. J Strength Cond Res 39(2): 200-209, 2025-The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the rebound countermovement jump (R-CMJ), as an alternate test of leg muscle function to the CMJ and drop jumps (DJs). Because the first phase of the R-CMJ mimics that of the CMJ, it is hypothesized that variables obtained in phase I of the R-CMJ will be like those of a CMJ. Similarly, because the second phase of a R-CMJ mimics a DJ, it is believed that the variables obtained from phase II will be like those from a DJ. Collegiate male American football players ( N = 46) aged 18-24 years completed CMJs and R-CMJs on a portable force plate. Tests were completed on 3 separate days to determine the repeatability of select variables and to establish their validity. In addition, a subgroup ( N = 20) of players from the cohort completed DJs from both 30 cm (DJ30) and 45 cm (DJ45) to determine the concurrent validity of the variables obtained from the second phase of the R-CMJ. Most variables obtained from the CMJ and R-CMJ phase I were found to be reliable, except for time-to-take-off. The variables from the DJ30, DJ45, and R-CMJ phase II displayed moderate to good reliability; however, all coefficient of variations were >10%. Jump height achieved in the CMJ was significantly greater than that achieved in phase I of the R-CMJ. The reactive strength index was significantly different in the R-CMJ compared with the DJ from both 30 and 45 cm heights. Although the R-CMJ may be inviting for coaches to use owing to its ease and time efficiency, the results of this study highlight that it may not provide a valid representation of an athlete's reactive strength.
塔尔佩伊,SW,德雷克,M,海因茨,L,贝朗热,A,奥格雷迪,MW,杨,WB,蒙迪,PD,詹姆斯·L,加贝特,TJ,加德纳,EC。美国国家大学体育协会第一分区美式橄榄球运动员反弹性反向纵跳的可靠性和有效性。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(2): 200 - 209,2025年——本研究的目的是调查反弹性反向纵跳(R - CMJ)作为纵跳(CMJ)和下落跳(DJs)的腿部肌肉功能替代测试的可靠性和有效性。由于R - CMJ的第一阶段模仿CMJ的第一阶段,因此假设在R - CMJ第一阶段获得的变量将与CMJ的变量相似。同样,由于R - CMJ的第二阶段模仿DJ,所以认为从第二阶段获得的变量将与DJ的变量相似。18 - 24岁的大学男子美式橄榄球运动员(N = 46)在便携式测力板上完成了CMJ和R - CMJ测试。测试在3个不同的日子完成,以确定选定变量的可重复性并确定其有效性。此外,该队列中的一个亚组(N = 20)运动员从30厘米(DJ30)和45厘米(DJ45)高度完成下落跳,以确定从R - CMJ第二阶段获得的变量的同时效度。除起跳时间外,从CMJ和R - CMJ第一阶段获得的大多数变量被发现是可靠的。DJ30、DJ45和R - CMJ第二阶段的变量显示出中等至良好的可靠性;然而,所有变异系数均>10%。CMJ中达到的跳跃高度显著高于R - CMJ第一阶段达到的高度。与从30厘米和45厘米高度下落跳相比,R - CMJ中的反应力量指数有显著差异。尽管由于其简便性和时间效率,R - CMJ可能会吸引教练使用,但本研究结果表明,它可能无法有效代表运动员的反应力量。