Grazier K L, Richardson W C, Martin D P, Diehr P
Health Serv Res. 1986 Feb;20(6 Pt 1):659-82.
The research reported here examined the factors which affected the decision to remain with either Blue Cross of Washington and Alaska or Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, or to change to an independent practice association (IPA) in which the primary care physicians control all care. The natural setting allowed examination of the characteristics of families with experience in structurally different plans; a decision not influenced by premium differentials; the importance of the role of usual provider; and a family-based decision using multivariate techniques. An expected utility model implied that factors affecting preferences included future need for medical care; access to care; financial resources to meet the need for care; and previous level of experience with plan and provider. Analysis of interview and medical record abstract data from 1,497 families revealed the importance of maintaining a satisfactory relationship with the usual sources of care in the decision to change plans. Adverse selection into the new IPA as measured by health status and previous utilization of medical services was not noted.
继续留在华盛顿和阿拉斯加蓝十字会或普吉特海湾集团健康合作社,还是转而加入由初级保健医生掌控所有医疗服务的独立执业协会(IPA)。自然环境使得能够考察在结构不同的医保计划中有过体验的家庭的特征;该决定不受保费差异影响;常规医疗服务提供者角色的重要性;以及运用多变量技术做出的基于家庭的决定。一个预期效用模型表明,影响偏好的因素包括未来的医疗需求;获得医疗服务的机会;满足医疗需求的财务资源;以及之前在医保计划和医疗服务提供者方面的经验水平。对来自1497个家庭的访谈和病历摘要数据的分析表明,在决定更换医保计划时,与常规医疗服务来源保持令人满意的关系非常重要。未发现以健康状况和之前医疗服务利用情况衡量的向新IPA的逆向选择情况。