• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小分子药物在降低成本的同时,提供与生物制剂相当的健康益处。

Small-Molecule Drugs Offer Comparable Health Benefits To Biologics At Lower Costs.

机构信息

Katherine A. Clifford, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

A. Alex Levine, Tufts Medical Center.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Nov;43(11):1546-1552. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00363.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00363
PMID:39496089
Abstract

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 requires that Medicare negotiate a Maximum Fair Price for selected small-molecule drugs nine years after their Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval and thirteen years postapproval for selected biologics. The discrepancy between these time frames raises questions about the relative value of small-molecule drugs versus biologics. We compared the incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gains, incremental costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of small-molecule drugs and biologics approved by the FDA during the period 1999-2018. We used the Mann-Whitney U test (to compare medians) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (to compare the distributions). We found that small-molecule drugs and biologics offer similar magnitudes of incremental QALY gains (0.08 versus 0.10). Small-molecule drugs tend to be associated with lower additional costs ($4,738 versus $16,020) and more favorable cost-effectiveness ($108,314 per QALY versus $228,286 per QALY). Creating parity regarding time to Medicare price negotiation may be appropriate.

摘要

2022 年《降低通胀法案》要求,在获得食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 批准后 9 年,以及获得 FDA 批准后 13 年,对选定的小分子药物和生物制剂进行医保谈判,以确定最高公平价格。这些时间框架之间的差异引发了关于小分子药物与生物制剂相对价值的问题。我们比较了 1999 年至 2018 年期间 FDA 批准的小分子药物和生物制剂的增量质量调整生命年 (QALY) 获益、增量成本和增量成本效益比 (ICER)。我们使用了 Mann-Whitney U 检验(用于比较中位数)和 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验(用于比较分布)。我们发现小分子药物和生物制剂提供的增量 QALY 获益幅度相似(0.08 与 0.10)。小分子药物往往与较低的额外成本(4738 美元与 16020 美元)和更有利的成本效益相关(每 QALY 为 108314 美元与每 QALY 为 228286 美元)。关于医保价格谈判时间的均等化可能是合适的。

相似文献

1
Small-Molecule Drugs Offer Comparable Health Benefits To Biologics At Lower Costs.小分子药物在降低成本的同时,提供与生物制剂相当的健康益处。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Nov;43(11):1546-1552. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00363.
2
Orphan Drugs Offer Larger Health Gains but Less Favorable Cost-effectiveness than Non-orphan Drugs.罕见病药物比非罕见病药物能带来更大的健康收益,但成本效益却更低。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2629-2636. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05805-2. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
3
The Health Benefits, Costs, and Cost-Effectiveness of Ultraorphan Drugs.超罕用药的健康效益、成本及成本效益分析
Value Health. 2024 Dec;27(12):1656-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.005. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
4
Despite high costs, specialty drugs may offer value for money comparable to that of traditional drugs.尽管费用高昂,但专科药物的性价比可能与传统药物相当。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Oct;33(10):1751-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0574.
5
Are Drug Novelty Characteristics Associated With Greater Health Benefits?药物新颖特征是否与更大的健康益处相关?
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov;22(6):827-832. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00910-3. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
6
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Tofacitinib Compared with Biologics in Biologic-Naïve Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis in Japan.日本生物初治中重度溃疡性结肠炎患者中托法替布与生物制剂的成本-效果分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 May;41(5):589-604. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01254-x. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
7
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Early Compared with Late or No Biologic Treatment to Manage Crohn's Disease using Real-World Data.使用真实世界数据评估早期与晚期或无生物治疗管理克罗恩病的成本效益。
J Crohns Colitis. 2020 May 21;14(4):490-500. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz169.
8
Postapproval Innovation For Oncology Drugs And The Inflation Reduction Act.肿瘤药物的审批后创新与《降低通胀法案》。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Oct;43(10):1400-1409. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00202.
9
Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5070.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Strategies with Biologics in Accordance with Treatment Guidelines for Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Patient-Level Model.依强直性脊柱炎治疗指南使用生物制剂的治疗策略的成本效益:患者水平模型
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Oct;26(10):1219-1231. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.10.1219.