Suppr超能文献

个性化止血带压力与四肢创伤骨科手术中的统一止血带压力:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。

Personalized tourniquet pressure versus uniform tourniquet pressure in trauma orthopedic surgery of extremities: a prospective randomized controlled study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100035, China.

Department of Orthopedic, People's Hospital Of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region China, Urumqi, 830001, Xinjiang, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 5;19(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05217-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tourniquets are widely used in limb fracture surgeries. Controversies still exist about the pressure inflated, including unified tourniquet inflation pressure (UTIP) and personalized tourniquet inflation pressure (PTIP). This study evaluated the hemostatic effect between UTIP and PTIP based on systolic blood pressure (SBP) in extremity fracture patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with fresh extremity fractures requiring tourniquets during surgeries were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to the UTIP and PTIP groups. The inflation pressure was set to 250 mmHg for the upper extremities and 300 mmHg for the lower extremities in the UTIP group and SBP plus 50 mmHg for the upper extremities and SBP plus 100 mmHg for the lower extremities in the PTIP group. The primary outcome was a hemostatic effect evaluated by the surgeon (satisfied or dissatisfied). Other secondary outcomes included postoperative changes in limb swelling and tourniquet-related complications.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the UTIP group or the PTIP group, and each group has 72 patients (36 upper limb and 36 lower limb). Totally, the hemostasis effect of the PTIP group was worse than that of the UTIP group by non-inferiority test. The hemostatic effect of upper limb fractures with SBP plus 50 mmHg for tourniquet inflation pressure was also worse than that with 250mmHg; however, there was no statistically significant difference between 300mmHg and SBP plus 100 mmHg in the lower limb group hemostasis effect due to a lack of power. Also, no difference was observed in the incidence of complications (p = 1.000) and postoperative changes in limb swelling during 2 days after surgery (upper limb: P1 = 0.546, P2 = 0.545; lower limb: P1 = 0.408, P2 = 0.857) between the PTIP and UTIP group.

CONCLUSION

In the surgery of limb fractures, setting SBP + 50mmHg as tourniquet pressure may not be sufficient for upper limbs. Also, we found no difference between the SBP + 100mmHg and the unified 300mmHg for lower limb surgeries.

摘要

背景

止血带广泛应用于四肢骨折手术中。关于充气压力,包括统一止血带充气压力(UTIP)和个性化止血带充气压力(PTIP),仍存在争议。本研究基于收缩压(SBP)评估 UTIP 和 PTIP 之间在四肢骨折患者中的止血效果。

材料与方法

前瞻性纳入需要在手术中使用止血带的新鲜四肢骨折患者,并随机分配至 UTIP 组和 PTIP 组。UTIP 组上肢充气压力设定为 250mmHg,下肢为 300mmHg;PTIP 组上肢充气压力设定为 SBP 加 50mmHg,下肢为 SBP 加 100mmHg。主要结局是由外科医生评估的止血效果(满意或不满意)。其他次要结局包括术后肢体肿胀变化和止血带相关并发症。

结果

共纳入 144 例患者,并随机分配至 UTIP 组或 PTIP 组,每组 72 例(上肢 36 例,下肢 36 例)。非劣效性检验结果显示,PTIP 组的止血效果不如 UTIP 组。上肢骨折使用 SBP 加 50mmHg 充气压力的止血效果也不如 250mmHg;然而,由于缺乏统计学效能,下肢组止血效果的 300mmHg 与 SBP 加 100mmHg 之间无统计学差异。另外,PTIP 组与 UTIP 组在并发症发生率(p=1.000)和术后 2 天肢体肿胀变化方面无差异(上肢:P1=0.546,P2=0.545;下肢:P1=0.408,P2=0.857)。

结论

在四肢骨折手术中,将 SBP 加 50mmHg 作为止血带压力可能对上肢不足,且我们发现下肢手术中 SBP 加 100mmHg 与统一的 300mmHg 之间没有差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c6f7/11536778/35c87a3cd04d/13018_2024_5217_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验